Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

snapp.ir

سوپر اپلیکیشن اسنپ | سامانه هوشمند حمل‌ونقل | تاکسی اینترنتی

Page Load Speed

23.3 sec in total

First Response

636 ms

Resources Loaded

22 sec

Page Rendered

712 ms

snapp.ir screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Snapp content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about snapp.ir

از درخواست خودرو گرفته تا سفارش غذا، خرید سوپرمارکتی، خرید بلیط سفر، مشاوره‌ی پزشکی و روانشناسی، رزرو هتل و... را میتوانید با سوپراپلیکیشن اسنپ انجام دهید.

Visit snapp.ir

Key Findings

We analyzed Snapp.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 636 ms and then it took 22.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

snapp.ir performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,020 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

snapp.ir

636 ms

analytics.js

63 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

201 ms

styles.css

69 ms

styles-rtl.css

287 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Snapp.ir, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Amirajorloo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 990.3 kB (45%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Snapp.ir main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 77.3 kB

  • Original 94.5 kB
  • After minification 91.5 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 41.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snapp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 83 B

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 21.1 kB
  • After compression 21.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 871.8 kB

  • Original 974.4 kB
  • After minification 805.9 kB
  • After compression 102.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapp.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 871.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (54%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snapp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

snapp.ir accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

snapp.ir best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

snapp.ir SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapp.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snapp.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snapp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: