Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

snapxam.com

SnapXam - AI-Powered Math Tutor

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

891 ms

snapxam.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to snapxam.com homepage info - get ready to check Snap Xam best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about snapxam.com

Your math virtual assistant that allows you to learn math faster and easier. Math solver with steps.

Visit snapxam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Snapxam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snapxam.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,500 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

snapxam.com

32 ms

www.snapxam.com

94 ms

mathquill.min.css

13 ms

katex.min.css

25 ms

main.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Snapxam.com, 18% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 655.0 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Snapxam.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 817.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 20.6 kB

  • Original 28.4 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 817.2 kB
  • After minification 805.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snap Xam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 313.6 kB

  • Original 677.9 kB
  • After minification 677.9 kB
  • After compression 364.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 313.6 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 308.9 kB

  • Original 367.7 kB
  • After minification 367.0 kB
  • After compression 58.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapxam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 308.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (53%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snap Xam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

snapxam.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

snapxam.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

snapxam.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapxam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snapxam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Snap Xam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: