Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

sneek.nl

Sneek = Meer: watersportstad in Friesland met gezellig centrum

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

284 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

338 ms

sneek.nl screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sneek content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sneek.nl

Sneek is rijk bedeeld met monumenten en stadsgezichten, diverse musea, gezellig centrum en is rijk aan terrassen, cafés en restaurants.

Visit sneek.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Sneek.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sneek.nl performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.127

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sneek.nl

284 ms

supersized.css

177 ms

jquery.min.js

31 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

198 ms

supersized.3.2.7.min.js

264 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Sneek.nl, 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (927 ms) belongs to the original domain Sneek.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.3 kB (2%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Sneek.nl main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 61% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sneek images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 20.9 kB

  • Original 45.9 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 455 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sneek.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (25%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sneek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sneek.nl accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sneek.nl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sneek.nl SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sneek.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Sneek.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sneek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: