Tools & Wizards About Us
sneeke.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

sneeke.com

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

447 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

167 ms

sneeke.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sneeke content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sneeke.com

Visit sneeke.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sneeke.com page load time and found that the first response time was 447 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sneeke.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,190 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ww41.sneeke.com

447 ms

px.js

73 ms

px.js

75 ms

caf.js

73 ms

newcafv2.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Sneeke.com, 17% (2 requests) were made to B.rmgserving.com and 17% (2 requests) were made to D.rmgserving.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (447 ms) relates to the external source Ww41.sneeke.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.0 kB (30%)

Content Size

119.1 kB

After Optimization

83.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sneeke.com main page is 119.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 63.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 25.1 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 30.2 kB
  • After minification 21.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sneeke needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (27%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sneeke. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ww41.sneeke.com

ww41.sneeke.com

447 ms

px.js

px.js

73 ms

px.js

px.js

75 ms

caf.js

caf.js

73 ms

newcafv2.js

newcafv2.js

8 ms

body-bg.gif

body-bg.gif

24 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

23 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

24 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

22 ms

slave.html

slave.html

8 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

157 ms

arrows.jpg

arrows.jpg

4 ms

Accessibility Review

sneeke.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

sneeke.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

sneeke.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    >

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sneeke.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sneeke.com main page’s claimed encoding is >. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

sneeke.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sneeke. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: