Tools & Wizards About Us
sneezewheeze.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

sneezewheeze.com

Telehealth Visits Now Available | Allergy and Clinical Immunology Medical Group: Allergy & Immunology: Santa Monica, CA

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

470 ms

sneezewheeze.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sneezewheeze.com now to see the best up-to-date Sneezewheeze content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sneezewheeze.com

Participating Telehealth provider - Schedule a virtual visit today! Trusted Allergy & Immunology serving Santa Monica, CA. Contact us at 310-828-8534 or visit us at 1301 20th Street, Suite 220, Santa ...

Visit sneezewheeze.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sneezewheeze.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sneezewheeze.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sneezewheeze.com

12 ms

sneezewheeze.com

42 ms

www.sneezewheeze.com

869 ms

practice.atomic.application.scss

111 ms

1947457.png

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Sneezewheeze.com, 33% (5 requests) were made to Sa1s3.patientpop.com and 20% (3 requests) were made to Sa1s3optim.patientpop.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (869 ms) belongs to the original domain Sneezewheeze.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.3 kB (28%)

Content Size

399.4 kB

After Optimization

286.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sneezewheeze.com main page is 399.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 282.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 97.7 kB

  • Original 116.7 kB
  • After minification 96.6 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.2 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 282.2 kB
  • After minification 266.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sneezewheeze images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 59 B

  • Original 531 B
  • After minification 531 B
  • After compression 472 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59 B or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sneezewheeze. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

sneezewheeze.com

sneezewheeze.com

12 ms

sneezewheeze.com

sneezewheeze.com

42 ms

www.sneezewheeze.com

www.sneezewheeze.com

869 ms

practice.atomic.application.scss

practice.atomic.application.scss

111 ms

1947457.png

1947457.png

20 ms

fatd-badge.png

fatd-badge.png

49 ms

practice.application.js

practice.application.js

124 ms

1947448.jpg

1947448.jpg

7 ms

1947465.jpg

1947465.jpg

139 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

28 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

51 ms

pp-font-awesome-atomic-subset.woff

pp-font-awesome-atomic-subset.woff

52 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

56 ms

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

57 ms

aem.js

aem.js

75 ms

Accessibility Review

sneezewheeze.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

sneezewheeze.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sneezewheeze.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sneezewheeze.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sneezewheeze.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sneezewheeze.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sneezewheeze. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: