Tools & Wizards About Us
snipax.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

snipax.com

Detective Agency in Mumbai, Detectives in Mumbai, Private Detective & Investigation Services in Mumbai, India

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

543 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

377 ms

snipax.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to snipax.com homepage info - get ready to check Snipax best content right away, or after learning these important things about snipax.com

Snipax is one of the leading Detective Agency in Mumbai India. We offer private detectives, Pre & post matrimonial detective, Personal Detective, corporate detective, Cybercrime, Divorce Cases, Loyalt...

Visit snipax.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Snipax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 543 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snipax.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.919

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

snipax.com

543 ms

js

71 ms

bootstrap.min.css

502 ms

style.css

695 ms

font-awesome.min.css

470 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Snipax.com, 23% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Snipax.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 37.3 kB (3%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Snipax.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 28.7 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snipax images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 58.0 kB
  • After minification 57.9 kB
  • After compression 56.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 46.0 kB
  • After minification 46.0 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snipax.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (50%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snipax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

snipax.com

snipax.com

543 ms

js

js

71 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

502 ms

style.css

style.css

695 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

470 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

485 ms

css

css

33 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

482 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

497 ms

snipax_new_logo.png

snipax_new_logo.png

790 ms

slider-1.jpg

slider-1.jpg

1429 ms

blog-img.jpg

blog-img.jpg

966 ms

blog-img-1.jpg

blog-img-1.jpg

987 ms

blog-img-2.jpg

blog-img-2.jpg

791 ms

blog-img-3.jpg

blog-img-3.jpg

926 ms

blog-img-4.jpg

blog-img-4.jpg

1170 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1010 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1160 ms

menumaker.js

menumaker.js

1208 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

1234 ms

sticky-header.js

sticky-header.js

1257 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1398 ms

slider-carousel.js

slider-carousel.js

1404 ms

service-carousel.js

service-carousel.js

1452 ms

back-to-top.js

back-to-top.js

1480 ms

blog-img-5.jpg

blog-img-5.jpg

1507 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

1636 ms

call.png

call.png

1640 ms

snipax_new_ft_logo.png

snipax_new_ft_logo.png

1665 ms

cta-img.jpg

cta-img.jpg

2204 ms

cd-top-arrow.svg

cd-top-arrow.svg

1029 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlE92JQEk.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlE92JQEk.woff

12 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff

17 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedHFHGPc.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedHFHGPc.woff

46 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedHFHGPezSQ.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedHFHGPezSQ.woff

51 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlE92JQEk.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlE92JQEk.woff

52 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff

51 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlE92JQEk.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlE92JQEk.woff

72 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff

51 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlE92JQEk.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlE92JQEk.woff

50 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff

72 ms

fontawesome-webfont5b62.woff

fontawesome-webfont5b62.woff

1214 ms

fontellof887.woff

fontellof887.woff

1305 ms

Accessibility Review

snipax.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

snipax.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

snipax.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snipax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snipax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

snipax.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snipax. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: