Tools & Wizards About Us
snowcomparison.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

snowcomparison.com

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

227 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

407 ms

snowcomparison.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Snowcomparison content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about snowcomparison.com

SEARCH. COMPARE. BOOK every ski resort on the planet

Visit snowcomparison.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Snowcomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snowcomparison.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value26,190 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

snowcomparison.com

227 ms

snowcomparison.com

723 ms

jquery.min.js

62 ms

bootstrap.css

221 ms

typeahead.min.css

242 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Snowcomparison.com, 23% (21 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (723 ms) belongs to the original domain Snowcomparison.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 321.9 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Snowcomparison.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 709.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 87.3 kB

  • Original 114.1 kB
  • After minification 101.5 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 462.3 kB
  • After minification 442.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snowcomparison images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 210.1 kB

  • Original 709.5 kB
  • After minification 705.0 kB
  • After compression 499.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.1 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 47.2 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snowcomparison.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (54%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snowcomparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

snowcomparison.com

snowcomparison.com

227 ms

snowcomparison.com

snowcomparison.com

723 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

62 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

221 ms

typeahead.min.css

typeahead.min.css

242 ms

typeahead-kv.min.css

typeahead-kv.min.css

245 ms

kv-widgets.min.css

kv-widgets.min.css

244 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

89 ms

chosen.min.css

chosen.min.css

247 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

245 ms

style.css

style.css

285 ms

media.css

media.css

275 ms

load.sumome.com

load.sumome.com

89 ms

mc-validate.js

mc-validate.js

108 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

372 ms

yii.js

yii.js

210 ms

typeahead.bundle.min.js

typeahead.bundle.min.js

355 ms

typeahead-kv.min.js

typeahead-kv.min.js

210 ms

handlebars.min.js

handlebars.min.js

369 ms

kv-widgets.min.js

kv-widgets.min.js

263 ms

jsapi

jsapi

73 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

46 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

567 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

350 ms

script.js

script.js

455 ms

map_data.js

map_data.js

716 ms

compare2.js

compare2.js

593 ms

search2.js

search2.js

589 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

563 ms

loader.js

loader.js

44 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

302 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

160 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

300 ms

heap-3963307492.js

heap-3963307492.js

410 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

435 ms

terrain_easy.png

terrain_easy.png

555 ms

terrain_mid.png

terrain_mid.png

547 ms

terrain_diff.png

terrain_diff.png

554 ms

reast3.png

reast3.png

511 ms

country3.png

country3.png

507 ms

hotjar-380492.js

hotjar-380492.js

450 ms

d384c27b63dc2215c7bb699dee929b26.jpg

d384c27b63dc2215c7bb699dee929b26.jpg

630 ms

890dcd27a4a2a2aba0eff06afd8a0e67.jpg

890dcd27a4a2a2aba0eff06afd8a0e67.jpg

500 ms

d3ca70f990dc9e029213633c4ea9cc52.jpg

d3ca70f990dc9e029213633c4ea9cc52.jpg

503 ms

fdd1ad07e31d3297d96dafdf2532b670.jpg

fdd1ad07e31d3297d96dafdf2532b670.jpg

630 ms

c8f9a64fb8c7d9297a74834005c2efe2.jpg

c8f9a64fb8c7d9297a74834005c2efe2.jpg

501 ms

53e95e76bcff8653493c6e97bf72e935.jpg

53e95e76bcff8653493c6e97bf72e935.jpg

569 ms

Gotham-Bold.woff

Gotham-Bold.woff

571 ms

Gotham-Medium.woff

Gotham-Medium.woff

571 ms

Gotham-Book.woff

Gotham-Book.woff

572 ms

Gotham-Black.woff

Gotham-Black.woff

628 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

627 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

245 ms

263315460710659

263315460710659

247 ms

collect

collect

116 ms

collect

collect

157 ms

collect

collect

352 ms

collect

collect

235 ms

modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js

modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js

225 ms

js

js

259 ms

h

h

258 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

423 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

135 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

225 ms

gen_204

gen_204

237 ms

common.js

common.js

209 ms

util.js

util.js

211 ms

map.js

map.js

327 ms

marker.js

marker.js

327 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

203 ms

infowindow.js

infowindow.js

193 ms

visit-data

visit-data

636 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

238 ms

onion.js

onion.js

169 ms

m3.png

m3.png

87 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

116 ms

m4.png

m4.png

79 ms

m2.png

m2.png

74 ms

m1.png

m1.png

80 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

55 ms

vt

vt

53 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

116 ms

vt

vt

38 ms

vt

vt

43 ms

vt

vt

41 ms

vt

vt

37 ms

vt

vt

38 ms

vt

vt

47 ms

vt

vt

55 ms

vt

vt

15 ms

Accessibility Review

snowcomparison.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

snowcomparison.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

snowcomparison.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snowcomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snowcomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

snowcomparison.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Snowcomparison. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: