2.6 sec in total
176 ms
2.2 sec
233 ms
Click here to check amazing SNUG content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about snug.in
SNUG Technologies offers the most comprehensive portfolio of call center software allowing your organisation to add functionality when and how you want whether on cloud, on-premise or hybrid solution,...
Visit snug.inWe analyzed Snug.in page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
snug.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
14/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value18.1 s
3/100
10%
176 ms
79 ms
113 ms
115 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Snug.in, 14% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (618 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 811.2 kB (48%)
1.7 MB
871.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Snug.in main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 793.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SNUG needs image optimization as it can save up to 142.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 406.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 406.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 208.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snug.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 208.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (53%)
64
30
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SNUG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
snug.in
176 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
79 ms
style.css
113 ms
layout.css
115 ms
main.css
118 ms
shortcodes.css
134 ms
icons.css
139 ms
flexslider.css
144 ms
prettyPhoto.css
170 ms
responsive.css
177 ms
settings.css
175 ms
dynamic-captions.css
200 ms
static-captions.css
203 ms
fonts.css
208 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
300 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
234 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
321 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
272 ms
modernizr.js
275 ms
caroufred.js
276 ms
isotope.js
293 ms
flexslider.js
391 ms
prettyPhoto.js
391 ms
plugins.js
498 ms
main.js
393 ms
comment-reply.min.js
391 ms
wp-embed.min.js
392 ms
slide-bg1-1140x468.jpg
510 ms
logo-snug1.png
148 ms
hosted-call-center.png
432 ms
350px-Avaya_Logo.svg_.png
147 ms
banner-snug-desk.png
431 ms
airtel1.png
148 ms
tata-sky1.png
150 ms
tata-aig1.png
148 ms
samsung1.png
151 ms
mmt1.png
149 ms
isssdb1.png
420 ms
ipru1.png
422 ms
etisalat1.png
421 ms
ebl1.png
423 ms
uninor1.png
423 ms
air-india1.png
424 ms
UBABankLogo-e1409656669693.png
425 ms
snug-atm-secure.png
428 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
389 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
390 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
391 ms
blandes.ttf
518 ms
SocialMedia.woff
461 ms
icomoon.woff
391 ms
MuseoSans_500-webfont.woff
393 ms
MuseoSans_500.woff
281 ms
analytics.js
240 ms
likebox.php
218 ms
loader.gif
138 ms
timer.png
138 ms
collect
29 ms
coloredbg.png
81 ms
large_left.png
71 ms
large_right.png
72 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
284 ms
56WNbrUYLbL.css
355 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
491 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
618 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
485 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
487 ms
297072_296132977078238_1380196636_n.jpg
342 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
76 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
75 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
72 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
69 ms
snug.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
snug.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
snug.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snug.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snug.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
snug.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SNUG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: