Tools & Wizards About Us
softsearch.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

softsearch.net

Information Technology Recruiting Agency / Reston, VA, SoftSEARCH Information Technology Recruiting & Search Firm | Reston, VA - SoftSearch

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

8.3 sec

Page Rendered

384 ms

softsearch.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to softsearch.net homepage info - get ready to check SoftSEARCH best content right away, or after learning these important things about softsearch.net

recruiting firm in blockchain, C++, LInux, DevOps, Ansible, Chef, Puppet, SAP, Google Cloud, AWS, Top Secret, Full Scop Poly SoftSEARCH represents mid-and-senior level IT and IT Consulting opportuniti...

Visit softsearch.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Softsearch.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

softsearch.net performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.143

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

softsearch.net

1087 ms

softsearch.net

1132 ms

www.softsearch.net

1105 ms

www.softsearch.net

1176 ms

jquery.js

1127 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Softsearch.net, 63% (47 requests) were made to Assets.myregisteredsite.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to 000kv59.wcomhost.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Softsearch.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.2 MB (73%)

Content Size

8.4 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Softsearch.net main page is 8.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 94.0 kB

  • Original 119.5 kB
  • After minification 118.8 kB
  • After compression 25.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 6.0 MB

  • Original 8.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SoftSEARCH needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.0 MB or 74% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 68.2 kB

  • Original 199.8 kB
  • After minification 182.1 kB
  • After compression 131.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.2 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 974 B

  • Original 7.8 kB
  • After minification 7.8 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Softsearch.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 974 B or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (68%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SoftSEARCH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

softsearch.net

softsearch.net

1087 ms

softsearch.net

softsearch.net

1132 ms

www.softsearch.net

www.softsearch.net

1105 ms

www.softsearch.net

www.softsearch.net

1176 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1127 ms

button.css

button.css

1101 ms

browserBehavior.js

browserBehavior.js

34 ms

utils.js

utils.js

77 ms

shared.js

shared.js

1102 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

112 ms

uaDefaultStylesReset.css

uaDefaultStylesReset.css

1101 ms

popup.js

popup.js

214 ms

ResourceLoader.js

ResourceLoader.js

1105 ms

webcom_copyright_kw.js

webcom_copyright_kw.js

1105 ms

googleFonts.css

googleFonts.css

28 ms

css

css

62 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

20 ms

core.js

core.js

27 ms

jqueryvalidate.js

jqueryvalidate.js

30 ms

photoalbum.js

photoalbum.js

25 ms

socialmediashare.js

socialmediashare.js

27 ms

footercontact.js

footercontact.js

24 ms

galleria.js

galleria.js

70 ms

lightgallery.js

lightgallery.js

343 ms

justifiedgallery.js

justifiedgallery.js

39 ms

lightslider.js

lightslider.js

342 ms

form.js

form.js

20 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

18 ms

bgIframe.js

bgIframe.js

18 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

20 ms

handler.js

handler.js

19 ms

helper.js

helper.js

20 ms

positioner.js

positioner.js

19 ms

structure.css

structure.css

34 ms

templates.js

templates.js

35 ms

defaults.js

defaults.js

35 ms

photoalbum.galleria.io.js

photoalbum.galleria.io.js

37 ms

photoalbum.light.weight.js

photoalbum.light.weight.js

42 ms

photoalbum.css

photoalbum.css

36 ms

smstemplates.js

smstemplates.js

52 ms

socialmediashare.css

socialmediashare.css

52 ms

jquery.json-2.2.min.js

jquery.json-2.2.min.js

54 ms

templates.js

templates.js

54 ms

footercontact.css

footercontact.css

55 ms

utils.js

utils.js

85 ms

resources.js

resources.js

86 ms

templates.js

templates.js

87 ms

form.css

form.css

86 ms

form_generic.css

form_generic.css

87 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

17 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

4 ms

125256463.png

125256463.png

45 ms

125256490.png

125256490.png

137 ms

125256483.png

125256483.png

132 ms

125256485.png

125256485.png

120 ms

125256492.png

125256492.png

365 ms

125256476.jpg

125256476.jpg

442 ms

125256458.png

125256458.png

101 ms

125256458.png

125256458.png

66 ms

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9g.ttf

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9g.ttf

98 ms

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6A.ttf

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6A.ttf

122 ms

lightslider.min.css

lightslider.min.css

20 ms

125295024.jpg

125295024.jpg

682 ms

126569602.png

126569602.png

1188 ms

126569601.png

126569601.png

1416 ms

126569604.png

126569604.png

1994 ms

126591618.png

126591618.png

1488 ms

placeholder.png

placeholder.png

25 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

18 ms

facebook-color.png

facebook-color.png

19 ms

twitter-color.png

twitter-color.png

17 ms

linkedin-color.png

linkedin-color.png

18 ms

logger.php

logger.php

307 ms

FB.Share

FB.Share

34 ms

controls.png

controls.png

19 ms

Accessibility Review

softsearch.net accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

softsearch.net best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

softsearch.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Softsearch.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Softsearch.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

softsearch.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SoftSEARCH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: