6.6 sec in total
2.3 sec
3.6 sec
750 ms
Visit solarclipper.com now to see the best up-to-date Solar Clipper content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about solarclipper.com
news and views from the creator of the golden age of the solar clipper
Visit solarclipper.comWe analyzed Solarclipper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
solarclipper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
2290 ms
139 ms
280 ms
275 ms
280 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Solarclipper.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com and 4% (1 request) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Solarclipper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 253.2 kB (32%)
795.7 kB
542.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Solarclipper.com main page is 795.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 447.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Solar Clipper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 177.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 177.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Solarclipper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (50%)
26
13
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Solar Clipper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
solarclipper.com
2290 ms
style.css
139 ms
styles.css
280 ms
social_widget.css
275 ms
podpress.css
280 ms
1pixelout_audio-player.js
275 ms
jquery.js
373 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
278 ms
podpress.js
410 ms
audio-player.js
372 ms
jquery.form.min.js
392 ms
scripts.js
393 ms
gprofiles.js
54 ms
wp-embed.min.js
391 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
346 ms
ga.js
6 ms
__utm.gif
42 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
380 ms
pixel.gif
376 ms
header_images_starfield_940x198.png
851 ms
01-In_Ashes_BornB_ebook-333x500.jpg
439 ms
simple-smile.png
371 ms
facebook.png
368 ms
twitter.png
366 ms
rss.png
367 ms
email.png
450 ms
wordpress.png
448 ms
solarclipper.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
solarclipper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
solarclipper.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Solarclipper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Solarclipper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
solarclipper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Solar Clipper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: