Tools & Wizards About Us
solliance.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

solliance.eu

Solliance Solar Research - European research institute in thin-film solar

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

293 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

134 ms

solliance.eu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to solliance.eu homepage info - get ready to check Solliance best content right away, or after learning these important things about solliance.eu

Solliance researches thin-film solar technology. We conduct shared research to with academic and industrial partners. Founded by TNO, imec and TU/e.

Visit solliance.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Solliance.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

solliance.eu performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,070 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

solliance.eu

293 ms

solliance.eu

404 ms

www.solliance.eu

388 ms

www.solliance.eu

518 ms

style.css

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (113 requests) were addressed to the original Solliance.eu, 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (981 ms) belongs to the original domain Solliance.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

377.7 kB

After Optimization

297.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Solliance.eu main page is 377.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 217.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 75.3 kB

  • Original 92.8 kB
  • After minification 88.5 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 67.7 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Solliance images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 217.2 kB
  • After minification 217.2 kB
  • After compression 216.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 99 (93%)

Requests Now

106

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Solliance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 73 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

solliance.eu

solliance.eu

293 ms

solliance.eu

solliance.eu

404 ms

www.solliance.eu

www.solliance.eu

388 ms

www.solliance.eu

www.solliance.eu

518 ms

style.css

style.css

191 ms

css

css

36 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

291 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

305 ms

front.css

front.css

301 ms

core_style.css

core_style.css

298 ms

light_style.css

light_style.css

300 ms

form-themes.css

form-themes.css

298 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

389 ms

wp-mediaelement.css

wp-mediaelement.css

393 ms

style.css

style.css

395 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

397 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

395 ms

style.css

style.css

400 ms

dripicons.css

dripicons.css

485 ms

kiko-all.css

kiko-all.css

488 ms

font-awesome-5.min.css

font-awesome-5.min.css

592 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

705 ms

print.css

print.css

491 ms

style_dynamic_callback.css

style_dynamic_callback.css

496 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

584 ms

style_dynamic_responsive_callback.css

style_dynamic_responsive_callback.css

584 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

687 ms

core-dashboard.min.css

core-dashboard.min.css

598 ms

style.css

style.css

679 ms

gdpr-main-nf.css

gdpr-main-nf.css

680 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

879 ms

jquery-migrate.js

jquery-migrate.js

732 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

776 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

778 ms

front.js

front.js

785 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

793 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

981 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

795 ms

hooks.js

hooks.js

796 ms

i18n.js

i18n.js

802 ms

api.js

api.js

35 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

810 ms

collapse.js

collapse.js

793 ms

core.js

core.js

687 ms

accordion.js

accordion.js

685 ms

menu.js

menu.js

688 ms

dom-ready.js

dom-ready.js

694 ms

a11y.js

a11y.js

780 ms

autocomplete.js

autocomplete.js

776 ms

controlgroup.js

controlgroup.js

695 ms

checkboxradio.js

checkboxradio.js

691 ms

button.js

button.js

692 ms

datepicker.js

datepicker.js

695 ms

mouse.js

mouse.js

780 ms

resizable.js

resizable.js

777 ms

draggable.js

draggable.js

693 ms

dialog.js

dialog.js

691 ms

droppable.js

droppable.js

690 ms

progressbar.js

progressbar.js

688 ms

selectable.js

selectable.js

740 ms

sortable.js

sortable.js

796 ms

slider.js

slider.js

677 ms

spinner.js

spinner.js

675 ms

style.css

style.css

597 ms

tooltip.js

tooltip.js

702 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

687 ms

effect.js

effect.js

657 ms

effect-blind.js

effect-blind.js

655 ms

effect-bounce.js

effect-bounce.js

612 ms

effect-clip.js

effect-clip.js

612 ms

effect-drop.js

effect-drop.js

605 ms

effect-explode.js

effect-explode.js

712 ms

effect-fade.js

effect-fade.js

635 ms

effect-fold.js

effect-fold.js

631 ms

effect-highlight.js

effect-highlight.js

628 ms

effect-pulsate.js

effect-pulsate.js

625 ms

effect-size.js

effect-size.js

619 ms

effect-scale.js

effect-scale.js

590 ms

effect-shake.js

effect-shake.js

590 ms

effect-slide.js

effect-slide.js

591 ms

effect-transfer.js

effect-transfer.js

588 ms

doubletaptogo.js

doubletaptogo.js

588 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

582 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

588 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

589 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

591 ms

mediaelement-and-player.js

mediaelement-and-player.js

597 ms

mediaelement-migrate.js

mediaelement-migrate.js

589 ms

wp-mediaelement.js

wp-mediaelement.js

581 ms

jquery.waitforimages.js

jquery.waitforimages.js

588 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

589 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

590 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

592 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

591 ms

skrollr.js

skrollr.js

587 ms

default_dynamic_callback.js

default_dynamic_callback.js

589 ms

default.min.js

default.min.js

547 ms

comment-reply.js

comment-reply.js

541 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

483 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

485 ms

wp-polyfill.js

wp-polyfill.js

485 ms

index.js

index.js

570 ms

main.js

main.js

572 ms

lazyload.js

lazyload.js

616 ms

Solliance_sec_2023-1-e1721053567413.png

Solliance_sec_2023-1-e1721053567413.png

615 ms

NVL160914W1888-min-1-e1568282907172-1024x461.jpg

NVL160914W1888-min-1-e1568282907172-1024x461.jpg

616 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

28 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

35 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

44 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

56 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

56 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

55 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

614 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

38 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

552 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

559 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

744 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

652 ms

Header_Lustrum_S.png

Header_Lustrum_S.png

195 ms

Solliance_sec_lustrum_No_payoff_Wit-300x54.png

Solliance_sec_lustrum_No_payoff_Wit-300x54.png

100 ms

Soliance_thin-film-solar-research.png

Soliance_thin-film-solar-research.png

101 ms

Header_Lustrum_S.png

Header_Lustrum_S.png

99 ms

Accessibility Review

solliance.eu accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

solliance.eu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

solliance.eu SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Solliance.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Solliance.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

solliance.eu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Solliance. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: