Tools & Wizards About Us
solutionbar.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

solutionbar.de

Nextwork: Beratung zu TISAX, B Corp, EcoVadis, IT

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

309 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

558 ms

solutionbar.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Solutionbar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about solutionbar.de

Als hochspezialisierte Beratung unterstützen wir Unternehmen dabei, die stetig wachsenden Anforderungen zu filtern, zu priorisieren und ihre Fortschritte sichtbar zu machen.

Visit solutionbar.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Solutionbar.de page load time and found that the first response time was 309 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

solutionbar.de performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

solutionbar.de

309 ms

www.nextwork.de

603 ms

2ap83.css

110 ms

2ap83.css

223 ms

2ap9t.css

409 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Solutionbar.de, 97% (36 requests) were made to Nextwork.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (782 ms) relates to the external source Nextwork.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 101.9 kB (86%)

Content Size

118.7 kB

After Optimization

16.8 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Solutionbar.de main page is 118.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 118.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 101.9 kB

  • Original 118.7 kB
  • After minification 115.8 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (87%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Solutionbar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

solutionbar.de

solutionbar.de

309 ms

www.nextwork.de

www.nextwork.de

603 ms

2ap83.css

2ap83.css

110 ms

2ap83.css

2ap83.css

223 ms

2ap9t.css

2ap9t.css

409 ms

2ap83.css

2ap83.css

304 ms

2ap83.css

2ap83.css

318 ms

2ap83.js

2ap83.js

428 ms

a6yy2.js

a6yy2.js

443 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

327 ms

dtgsnonce.js

dtgsnonce.js

399 ms

autoptimize_single_3182b2beddb1f798f66d27425b9f99d9.js

autoptimize_single_3182b2beddb1f798f66d27425b9f99d9.js

461 ms

autoptimize_single_0d049a961b36d490e5180c9553b66ad2.js

autoptimize_single_0d049a961b36d490e5180c9553b66ad2.js

462 ms

autoptimize_single_82c2e640f51df1f9b9a366d24ac68873.js

autoptimize_single_82c2e640f51df1f9b9a366d24ac68873.js

506 ms

autoptimize_single_16177da4bd1e66bb6d87410acffe83dd.js

autoptimize_single_16177da4bd1e66bb6d87410acffe83dd.js

512 ms

autoptimize_single_8fb932b4cde7be8cda25c54f51a9b100.js

autoptimize_single_8fb932b4cde7be8cda25c54f51a9b100.js

537 ms

autoptimize_single_b4a31d524890abbeffecb99966ba3ae6.js

autoptimize_single_b4a31d524890abbeffecb99966ba3ae6.js

558 ms

autoptimize_single_a3a1bc8818ccb283d7d76f4fa2ba9e51.js

autoptimize_single_a3a1bc8818ccb283d7d76f4fa2ba9e51.js

558 ms

autoptimize_single_58b2bf909169054b404816fe5bd172ab.js

autoptimize_single_58b2bf909169054b404816fe5bd172ab.js

556 ms

autoptimize_single_cd04e1079a4f10861aca58d9def315af.js

autoptimize_single_cd04e1079a4f10861aca58d9def315af.js

628 ms

autoptimize_single_c6658b64c083f122d3ab113432009afd.js

autoptimize_single_c6658b64c083f122d3ab113432009afd.js

628 ms

autoptimize_single_1115c65bd62165d952fac7c1b6918b2a.js

autoptimize_single_1115c65bd62165d952fac7c1b6918b2a.js

649 ms

autoptimize_single_94c42723b8465b91af56176b152fdf9b.js

autoptimize_single_94c42723b8465b91af56176b152fdf9b.js

651 ms

autoptimize_single_96550741c997fd57758441aa1759b21c.js

autoptimize_single_96550741c997fd57758441aa1759b21c.js

658 ms

autoptimize_single_9f5e45f09c498a001d491192689905dd.js

autoptimize_single_9f5e45f09c498a001d491192689905dd.js

658 ms

autoptimize_single_c6dc6b36c90e8ccd2033782b683a3342.js

autoptimize_single_c6dc6b36c90e8ccd2033782b683a3342.js

723 ms

autoptimize_single_caf8564e382a04a08679e291f6312395.js

autoptimize_single_caf8564e382a04a08679e291f6312395.js

724 ms

autoptimize_single_9bf890aed54314c60f6e2f136d0c55a8.js

autoptimize_single_9bf890aed54314c60f6e2f136d0c55a8.js

758 ms

autoptimize_single_71e0ab1a6f6be8de036a394937a8097b.js

autoptimize_single_71e0ab1a6f6be8de036a394937a8097b.js

754 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

782 ms

autoptimize_single_8bbe194c344a21ff01ab6eca99712536.js

autoptimize_single_8bbe194c344a21ff01ab6eca99712536.js

781 ms

MaisonNeue-Book.woff

MaisonNeue-Book.woff

465 ms

MaisonNeue-Medium.woff

MaisonNeue-Medium.woff

402 ms

MaisonNeue-Black.woff

MaisonNeue-Black.woff

403 ms

uncode-icons.woff

uncode-icons.woff

694 ms

NXT_Logo_CMYK_black.svg

NXT_Logo_CMYK_black.svg

284 ms

Beratung-TISAX-Zertifizierung-Nextwork-23.svg

Beratung-TISAX-Zertifizierung-Nextwork-23.svg

281 ms

Accessibility Review

solutionbar.de accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

solutionbar.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

solutionbar.de SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Solutionbar.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Solutionbar.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

solutionbar.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Solutionbar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: