4.5 sec in total
427 ms
3.7 sec
323 ms
Click here to check amazing Solveet content for Dominican Republic. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about solveet.com
Mejora como desarrollador, divirtiéndote, practicando y compartiendo experiencias codificando katas y ejercicios de programación en c#, java, ruby, groovy, php, python, javascript o el lenguaje que m...
Visit solveet.comWe analyzed Solveet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 427 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
solveet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value6.1 s
44/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value4.5 s
82/100
10%
427 ms
1404 ms
19 ms
275 ms
703 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Solveet.com, 23% (18 requests) were made to Gravatar.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Solveet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 598.0 kB (63%)
948.8 kB
350.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Solveet.com main page is 948.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 526.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Solveet needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 367.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 367.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 148.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Solveet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 148.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (59%)
75
31
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Solveet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
solveet.com
427 ms
www.solveet.com
1404 ms
ga.js
19 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
275 ms
styles.css
703 ms
jquery.gritter.css
276 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
741 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.18.min.js
856 ms
modernizr-2.0.6-development-only.js
544 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
544 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js
409 ms
bootstrap-dropdown.js
545 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.js
681 ms
bootstrap-popover.js
682 ms
bootstrap-modal.js
683 ms
bootstrap-transition.js
818 ms
bootstrap-alert.js
819 ms
jquery.gritter.min.js
819 ms
highlight.pack.js
977 ms
plusone.js
75 ms
widgets.js
90 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
617 ms
common.js
704 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
692 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
697 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
141 ms
jquery.ui.resizable.css
142 ms
jquery.ui.selectable.css
145 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
146 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.css
147 ms
jquery.ui.button.css
157 ms
jquery.ui.dialog.css
278 ms
jquery.ui.slider.css
278 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
283 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.css
284 ms
jquery.ui.progressbar.css
283 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
18 ms
feature-resuelve.png
169 ms
b1ae228e6f91535a8f5c7047646100d8
63 ms
feature-comenta.png
286 ms
feature-desafia.png
168 ms
logo-footer.png
168 ms
humanstxt.png
167 ms
cdbab5de67c182fd16290f5539074ce5
96 ms
02c8ecc24181d171df85a26458b9cd5f
153 ms
c040023d358dea878698a9a93430b8d0
154 ms
ce814471b09ec6b843e4b1bacd401f1c
155 ms
39608fb15d9ef0d2c668bacd62d54745
154 ms
e62ba41cc381339c786f314fb5d0b5b7
156 ms
15aba010af27540555f3563359409712
154 ms
bc19a6125071620f2ab03eb36d4212f4
157 ms
5c44b70c14abf9a1682acf880b30a361
157 ms
f3ed6c396e24c41569c81125ba34db38
157 ms
9ca827523529a13ba5382f0fc3dcaba0
158 ms
f2b8a70a6631f507851f0b7516aa4891
157 ms
3aa870072bd1bc24188409077c50fbc2
158 ms
6630a438b0cc7048736a0d17d9654f92
165 ms
5c44b70c14abf9a1682acf880b30a361
164 ms
b1ae228e6f91535a8f5c7047646100d8
165 ms
161f1b0b5a6cb55e43a32bbffb2e53ac
165 ms
all.js
166 ms
header-bg.png
177 ms
logo.png
269 ms
footer-bg.png
205 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
208 ms
cs8cSRv6G1orGyMiYg.js
158 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
133 ms
pagination.png
149 ms
162 ms
xd_arbiter.php
145 ms
xd_arbiter.php
268 ms
feedback-tab.png
17 ms
tab-horizontal-dark-3efc2033e3bb06b1eefaa3431d3d47d8.png
10 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.es.html
52 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
280 ms
info.json
105 ms
jot
83 ms
track.js
164 ms
solveet.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
solveet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
solveet.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Solveet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Solveet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
solveet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Solveet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: