2.5 sec in total
304 ms
1.9 sec
330 ms
Welcome to sonant.com homepage info - get ready to check Sonant best content right away, or after learning these important things about sonant.com
Sonant provides hosted customer-contact handling solutions that reduce operating costs and improve customer service.
Visit sonant.comWe analyzed Sonant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
sonant.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.0 s
0/100
10%
Value21.7 s
0/100
25%
Value13.7 s
1/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.776
5/100
15%
Value20.9 s
1/100
10%
304 ms
106 ms
55 ms
92 ms
335 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Sonant.com, 15% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (825 ms) belongs to the original domain Sonant.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (76%)
2.5 MB
601.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Sonant.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.2 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sonant images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 986.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 986.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 826.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sonant.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 826.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (83%)
47
8
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sonant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sonant.com
304 ms
js
106 ms
css
55 ms
tether.min.css
92 ms
bootstrap.min.css
335 ms
font-awesome.min.css
360 ms
glyphicon.css
291 ms
ionicons.min.css
430 ms
main.css
464 ms
main-shortcodes.css
456 ms
header.css
489 ms
form-element.css
397 ms
animation.css
426 ms
responsive.css
462 ms
font-icons.css
493 ms
utilities.css
495 ms
default.css
528 ms
settings.css
530 ms
layers.css
585 ms
custom.css
548 ms
sonant-logo-no-gradation.png
552 ms
curves-only-blue.png
556 ms
curves-only-green.png
639 ms
jquery.js
681 ms
jquery.nav.js
638 ms
jquery.validate.js
637 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
638 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
645 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
701 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
702 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
704 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
727 ms
modernizr.min.js
731 ms
tether.min.js
784 ms
bootstrap.min.js
784 ms
menuzord.js
783 ms
respond.js
785 ms
imagesloaded.js
785 ms
wow.min.js
825 ms
litetooltip.js
749 ms
theme-plugins.js
587 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
504 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
664 ms
theme.js
541 ms
swaplogo.js
499 ms
Hosted-and-Premised-based-diagram.png
476 ms
sonant-logo-white-blue.png
471 ms
abstract-backgrnd.svg
331 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf
18 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf
28 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf
79 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf
85 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
88 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
89 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
86 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
86 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
88 ms
revicons.woff
70 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
114 ms
sonant.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
sonant.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sonant.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sonant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sonant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sonant.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sonant. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: