Tools & Wizards About Us
sonarqube.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

sonarqube.org

Code Quality, Security & Static Analysis Tool with SonarQube | Sonar

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

156 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

546 ms

sonarqube.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sonarqube.org homepage info - get ready to check Sonar Qube best content for Azerbaijan right away, or after learning these important things about sonarqube.org

Empower development teams with a code quality, security and static analysis solution that deeply integrates into your enterprise environment that enables you to deploy Clean Code securely, consistentl...

Visit sonarqube.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Sonarqube.org page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sonarqube.org performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sonarqube.org

156 ms

312 ms

gtm.js

512 ms

sonar-logo-horizontal-dark-bg.svg

736 ms

java-color-padding.svg

642 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sonarqube.org, 85% (35 requests) were made to Assets-eu-01.kc-usercontent.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Sonarsource.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (736 ms) relates to the external source Assets-eu-01.kc-usercontent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 380.6 kB (58%)

Content Size

651.3 kB

After Optimization

270.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sonarqube.org main page is 651.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 233.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 193.1 kB

  • Original 233.1 kB
  • After minification 232.9 kB
  • After compression 39.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 193.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 173.1 kB
  • After minification 148.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sonar Qube needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 143.5 kB

  • Original 219.7 kB
  • After minification 217.7 kB
  • After compression 76.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 25.5 kB
  • After minification 19.3 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sonarqube.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (8%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sonar Qube. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sonarqube.org

sonarqube.org

156 ms

312 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

512 ms

sonar-logo-horizontal-dark-bg.svg

sonar-logo-horizontal-dark-bg.svg

736 ms

java-color-padding.svg

java-color-padding.svg

642 ms

kotlin-color-padding.svg

kotlin-color-padding.svg

640 ms

csharp-color-padding.svg

csharp-color-padding.svg

642 ms

cplus-color-padding.svg

cplus-color-padding.svg

647 ms

vb-color-padding.svg

vb-color-padding.svg

643 ms

javascript-color-padding.svg

javascript-color-padding.svg

646 ms

typescript-color-padding.svg

typescript-color-padding.svg

645 ms

python-color-padding.svg

python-color-padding.svg

643 ms

php-color-padding.svg

php-color-padding.svg

647 ms

terraform-color-padding.svg

terraform-color-padding.svg

653 ms

cloudformation-color-padding.svg

cloudformation-color-padding.svg

649 ms

css-color-padding.svg

css-color-padding.svg

657 ms

SonarQube_Logo.svg

SonarQube_Logo.svg

654 ms

webpack-runtime-eacec96ad9ff39bdc9dc.js

webpack-runtime-eacec96ad9ff39bdc9dc.js

164 ms

framework-203d89a6dc56e1689dcd.js

framework-203d89a6dc56e1689dcd.js

470 ms

app-9c50eade25391cf8d383.js

app-9c50eade25391cf8d383.js

517 ms

c-color-padding.svg

c-color-padding.svg

481 ms

azure-resource-manager-small-1.svg

azure-resource-manager-small-1.svg

489 ms

docker-color-padding.svg

docker-color-padding.svg

484 ms

Kubernetes_mark_color_with-padding.svg

Kubernetes_mark_color_with-padding.svg

492 ms

helm-blue.svg

helm-blue.svg

487 ms

abap-color-padding.svg

abap-color-padding.svg

493 ms

apex-color-padding.svg

apex-color-padding.svg

491 ms

cobol-color-padding.svg

cobol-color-padding.svg

490 ms

flex-color-padding.svg

flex-color-padding.svg

496 ms

go-color-padding.svg

go-color-padding.svg

503 ms

html-color-padding.svg

html-color-padding.svg

493 ms

obj-c-small.svg

obj-c-small.svg

500 ms

pli-color-padding.svg

pli-color-padding.svg

499 ms

plsql-color-padding.svg

plsql-color-padding.svg

501 ms

rpg-color-padding.svg

rpg-color-padding.svg

507 ms

ruby-color-padding.svg

ruby-color-padding.svg

504 ms

scala-color-padding.svg

scala-color-padding.svg

507 ms

swift-color-padding.svg

swift-color-padding.svg

509 ms

tsql-color-padding.svg

tsql-color-padding.svg

508 ms

vb6-color-padding.svg

vb6-color-padding.svg

512 ms

xml-color-padding.svg

xml-color-padding.svg

511 ms

Accessibility Review

sonarqube.org accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sonarqube.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sonarqube.org SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sonarqube.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sonarqube.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sonarqube.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sonar Qube. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: