Tools & Wizards About Us
sonatype.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

sonatype.org

My Sonatype

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

665 ms

sonatype.org screenshot

About Website

Visit sonatype.org now to see the best up-to-date Sonatype content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sonatype.org

My Sonatype

Visit sonatype.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Sonatype.org page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sonatype.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

sonatype.org

40 ms

www.sonatype.org

23 ms

home.css

3 ms

adroll.js

7 ms

analytics.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Sonatype.org, 13% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Now.eloqua.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Secure.p01.eloqua.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.2 kB (4%)

Content Size

306.7 kB

After Optimization

295.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sonatype.org main page is 306.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 279.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 892 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 62% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 279.6 kB
  • After minification 274.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sonatype images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 23.5 kB
  • After minification 22.3 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 804 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 435 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sonatype.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 804 B or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (33%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sonatype. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sonatype.org

sonatype.org

40 ms

www.sonatype.org

www.sonatype.org

23 ms

home.css

home.css

3 ms

adroll.js

adroll.js

7 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

elqCfg.js

elqCfg.js

10 ms

elqImg.js

elqImg.js

12 ms

elqScr.js

elqScr.js

32 ms

elqSetup.js

elqSetup.js

31 ms

sonatype-org-header.jpg

sonatype-org-header.jpg

35 ms

intro-header.png

intro-header.png

34 ms

box-nexus.jpg

box-nexus.jpg

59 ms

box-central.jpg

box-central.jpg

34 ms

box-support.jpg

box-support.jpg

56 ms

box-contributions.jpg

box-contributions.jpg

57 ms

rays-background.jpg

rays-background.jpg

57 ms

ga.js

ga.js

37 ms

svrGP.aspx

svrGP.aspx

148 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

33 ms

svrGP.aspx

svrGP.aspx

2441 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

32 ms

SEO Factors

sonatype.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sonatype.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sonatype.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

sonatype.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sonatype. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: