Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

sonnetstone.com

Sonnet Stone is well known Marble, Granite, Sandstone, Slatestone, Limestone, Cobblestone, Engineered quartz stone, Pebbles Manufacturers, Suppliers, ...

Page Load Speed

11.6 sec in total

First Response

976 ms

Resources Loaded

8.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.5 sec

sonnetstone.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sonnetstone.com now to see the best up-to-date Sonnet Stone content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sonnetstone.com

Marble, Granite, Sandstone, Slatestone, Limestone, Cobblestone, engineered quartz stone, Pebbles Manufacturers, Suppliers, Wholesaler & Exporter in India, USA and Tanzania - Sonnet Stone

Visit sonnetstone.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sonnetstone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 976 ms and then it took 10.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sonnetstone.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.295

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sonnetstone.com

976 ms

www.sonnetstone.com

1870 ms

font-awesome.min.css

629 ms

bootstrap.min.css

34 ms

style.css

632 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Sonnetstone.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Sonnetstone.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 597.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

13.5 MB

After Optimization

12.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Sonnetstone.com main page is 13.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 62.8 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 59.0 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.0 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 377.1 kB

  • Original 13.2 MB
  • After minification 12.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sonnet Stone images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 103.9 kB

  • Original 187.3 kB
  • After minification 153.1 kB
  • After compression 83.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 103.9 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 53.9 kB

  • Original 66.1 kB
  • After minification 56.6 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sonnetstone.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (25%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

71

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sonnet Stone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sonnetstone.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sonnetstone.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sonnetstone.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sonnetstone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sonnetstone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sonnet Stone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: