6 sec in total
1 sec
4.2 sec
788 ms
Welcome to sourcemediareprints.com homepage info - get ready to check Sourcemediareprints best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about sourcemediareprints.com
sourcemediareprints.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, sourcemediareprints.com has it a...
Visit sourcemediareprints.comWe analyzed Sourcemediareprints.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
sourcemediareprints.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value2,790 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.192
64/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
1044 ms
42 ms
84 ms
53 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Sourcemediareprints.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sourcemediareprints.com.
Page size can be reduced by 73.6 kB (39%)
190.7 kB
117.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Sourcemediareprints.com main page is 190.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 77.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sourcemediareprints needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sourcemediareprints.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (88%)
24
3
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sourcemediareprints. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sourcemediareprints.com
1044 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
42 ms
style.min.css
84 ms
styles.css
53 ms
link-juice-keeper-public.css
123 ms
font-awesome.min.css
25 ms
b3482e70ffc96ddadcb944d355e96be5.css
125 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
298 ms
style.css
413 ms
jquery.min.js
387 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
121 ms
link-juice-keeper-public.js
160 ms
ssba.css
163 ms
email-decode.min.js
128 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
206 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
247 ms
index.js
205 ms
ssba.js
253 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
261 ms
masonry.min.js
334 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
311 ms
pagination.js
347 ms
custom.js
627 ms
Source-Media.png
165 ms
ssbp.woff
83 ms
invisible.js
59 ms
sourcemediareprints.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sourcemediareprints.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sourcemediareprints.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sourcemediareprints.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sourcemediareprints.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sourcemediareprints.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sourcemediareprints. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: