Tools & Wizards About Us
spamfiltering.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

spamfiltering.com

Domain Name registration and Web Hosting | Hosting UK

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

283 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

383 ms

spamfiltering.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to spamfiltering.com homepage info - get ready to check Spamfiltering best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about spamfiltering.com

Rated 5 stars by customers, Hosting UK provide great value Domain Names, Web Hosting, Windows & Linux hosting, Cloud and Dedicated Servers, with UK support.

Visit spamfiltering.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Spamfiltering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 283 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spamfiltering.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,330 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

spamfiltering.com

283 ms

hostinguk.net

612 ms

gtm.js

95 ms

style.css

119 ms

css2

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Spamfiltering.com, 86% (77 requests) were made to Hostinguk.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (871 ms) relates to the external source Hostinguk.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.9 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Spamfiltering.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 58.8 kB

  • Original 74.3 kB
  • After minification 62.7 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 41.1 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spamfiltering images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 249.5 kB
  • After minification 249.5 kB
  • After compression 248.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (33%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

58

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spamfiltering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

spamfiltering.com

spamfiltering.com

283 ms

hostinguk.net

hostinguk.net

612 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

95 ms

style.css

style.css

119 ms

css2

css2

83 ms

css

css

116 ms

css

css

116 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

61 ms

nav.css

nav.css

205 ms

animations.css

animations.css

295 ms

introjs.css

introjs.css

294 ms

tooltip-classic.css

tooltip-classic.css

298 ms

index.css

index.css

301 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

69 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

298 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

327 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

64 ms

api.js

api.js

83 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

74 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

428 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

434 ms

slidebars.js

slidebars.js

439 ms

onscroll.js

onscroll.js

440 ms

jquery.tabs.js

jquery.tabs.js

440 ms

scroll-sneek.js

scroll-sneek.js

440 ms

intro.min.js

intro.min.js

512 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

514 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

516 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

515 ms

basket_functions.js

basket_functions.js

510 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

520 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

102 ms

huk-uk-logo.svg

huk-uk-logo.svg

287 ms

twitter-head.png

twitter-head.png

290 ms

linkedin-head.png

linkedin-head.png

281 ms

login-mobile.png

login-mobile.png

282 ms

weee-small.jpg

weee-small.jpg

285 ms

tour.jpg

tour.jpg

381 ms

cold-flame-small.jpg

cold-flame-small.jpg

569 ms

cornelli-small.jpg

cornelli-small.jpg

759 ms

krieder.jpg

krieder.jpg

383 ms

funky-small.jpg

funky-small.jpg

388 ms

good-foundations-small.jpg

good-foundations-small.jpg

480 ms

liza-small.jpg

liza-small.jpg

481 ms

nightingale-small.jpg

nightingale-small.jpg

484 ms

pacific-small.jpg

pacific-small.jpg

489 ms

sr-landscapes-small.jpg

sr-landscapes-small.jpg

768 ms

waters-small.jpg

waters-small.jpg

583 ms

vps-windows.png

vps-windows.png

584 ms

vps-linux.png

vps-linux.png

587 ms

website-design-header.webp

website-design-header.webp

671 ms

cpanel.png

cpanel.png

682 ms

office2016-home.png

office2016-home.png

683 ms

domain.png

domain.png

684 ms

plesk-banner.jpg

plesk-banner.jpg

771 ms

boots.png

boots.png

750 ms

font

font

64 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

115 ms

ecri.png

ecri.png

677 ms

mands.png

mands.png

678 ms

newportcc.png

newportcc.png

746 ms

gmc.jpg

gmc.jpg

759 ms

guarantee.jpg

guarantee.jpg

761 ms

windows.jpg

windows.jpg

768 ms

webbuilder.jpg

webbuilder.jpg

700 ms

uk-dc.png

uk-dc.png

698 ms

switch.jpg

switch.jpg

769 ms

thebest.jpg

thebest.jpg

776 ms

uk-domain.png

uk-domain.png

763 ms

wales.jpg

wales.jpg

770 ms

quote-face-3.jpg

quote-face-3.jpg

703 ms

microsoft.png

microsoft.png

702 ms

ripe.png

ripe.png

770 ms

cisco.png

cisco.png

780 ms

ispa.png

ispa.png

781 ms

linx.png

linx.png

697 ms

dell.png

dell.png

695 ms

grey-angle-small.png

grey-angle-small.png

693 ms

webdesign.jpg

webdesign.jpg

863 ms

123.jpg

123.jpg

689 ms

ms.jpg

ms.jpg

780 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

871 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

799 ms

megaphone.png

megaphone.png

596 ms

info-standard-header.png

info-standard-header.png

687 ms

video-quote.png

video-quote.png

694 ms

quote-back.png

quote-back.png

695 ms

close.png

close.png

691 ms

success.png

success.png

697 ms

err.png

err.png

759 ms

Accessibility Review

spamfiltering.com accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

spamfiltering.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

spamfiltering.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spamfiltering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spamfiltering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

spamfiltering.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spamfiltering. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: