1.8 sec in total
228 ms
1.4 sec
133 ms
Welcome to spamscorechecker.com homepage info - get ready to check Spamscorechecker best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about spamscorechecker.com
Visit spamscorechecker.comWe analyzed Spamscorechecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
spamscorechecker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value1.0 s
100/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
228 ms
551 ms
99 ms
27 ms
522 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Spamscorechecker.com, 20% (4 requests) were made to Trustseal.trustsealed.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (551 ms) belongs to the original domain Spamscorechecker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 12.0 kB (9%)
139.8 kB
127.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Spamscorechecker.com main page is 139.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 102.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spamscorechecker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 131 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spamscorechecker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (17%)
18
15
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spamscorechecker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
spamscorechecker.com
228 ms
spamscorechecker.com
551 ms
signup-style.css
99 ms
all.js
27 ms
trusts.js
522 ms
spacer.gif
193 ms
check-it-button.jpg
290 ms
header.jpg
455 ms
tablebg.jpg
168 ms
footer.jpg
257 ms
trustseal.trustsealed.com
483 ms
trustseal.trustsealed.com
495 ms
trustseal.trustsealed.com
503 ms
105 ms
xd_arbiter.php
53 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
like.php
76 ms
collect
12 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
28 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
18 ms
spamscorechecker.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
spamscorechecker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
spamscorechecker.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spamscorechecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Spamscorechecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spamscorechecker.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spamscorechecker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: