Tools & Wizards About Us
spark.ngo screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

spark.ngo

SPARK - Creating better jobs for young people in fragile states

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

378 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

839 ms

spark.ngo screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SPARK content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about spark.ngo

We support young people in regions affected by conflict to study, work and grow their own businesses. We create jobs for stability.

Visit spark.ngo

Key Findings

We analyzed Spark.ngo page load time and found that the first response time was 378 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spark.ngo performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,200 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

spark.ngo

378 ms

spark.ngo

596 ms

styles.css

290 ms

style.min.css

288 ms

main.css

490 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Spark.ngo, 9% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (607 ms) belongs to the original domain Spark.ngo.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 303.6 kB (80%)

Content Size

378.0 kB

After Optimization

74.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Spark.ngo main page is 378.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 325.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 271.7 kB

  • Original 325.1 kB
  • After minification 265.8 kB
  • After compression 53.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 59.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 271.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (60%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SPARK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

spark.ngo

spark.ngo

378 ms

spark.ngo

spark.ngo

596 ms

styles.css

styles.css

290 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

288 ms

main.css

main.css

490 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

25 ms

object-assign-auto.min.js

object-assign-auto.min.js

19 ms

main.js

main.js

607 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

208 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

208 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

457 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

455 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

455 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

456 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

458 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

458 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

529 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

458 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

530 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

530 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

532 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

62 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

15 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

js

js

212 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

176 ms

collect

collect

150 ms

arrow-right.svg

arrow-right.svg

143 ms

FuturaPT-Book.woff

FuturaPT-Book.woff

265 ms

FuturaPT-Medium.woff

FuturaPT-Medium.woff

264 ms

FuturaPT-Demi.woff

FuturaPT-Demi.woff

264 ms

collect

collect

42 ms

arrow-right-white.svg

arrow-right-white.svg

234 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

21 ms

Accessibility Review

spark.ngo accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

spark.ngo best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

spark.ngo SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spark.ngo can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spark.ngo main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

spark.ngo

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SPARK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: