Tools & Wizards About Us
spellchecker.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

spellchecker.us

Spell Check and Grammar Checker (Free)

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

471 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

spellchecker.us screenshot

About Website

Welcome to spellchecker.us homepage info - get ready to check Spell Checker best content right away, or after learning these important things about spellchecker.us

Corrector App is the best grammar checker in 2023.

Visit spellchecker.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Spellchecker.us page load time and found that the first response time was 471 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spellchecker.us performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

spellchecker.us

471 ms

corrector.app

228 ms

gppstub.js

139 ms

jquery.min.js

49 ms

pub-7636551983597361

91 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Spellchecker.us, 40% (19 requests) were made to Corrector.app and 40% (19 requests) were made to Ezojs.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (471 ms) belongs to the original domain Spellchecker.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 149.0 kB (49%)

Content Size

301.3 kB

After Optimization

152.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Spellchecker.us main page is 301.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 208.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 148.4 kB

  • Original 208.0 kB
  • After minification 208.0 kB
  • After compression 59.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 598 B

  • Original 93.2 kB
  • After minification 93.1 kB
  • After compression 92.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (88%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spell Checker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

spellchecker.us

spellchecker.us

471 ms

corrector.app

corrector.app

228 ms

gppstub.js

gppstub.js

139 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

49 ms

pub-7636551983597361

pub-7636551983597361

91 ms

gtagv4.js

gtagv4.js

50 ms

ezvideojscss.css

ezvideojscss.css

58 ms

ezvideojspluginscss.css

ezvideojspluginscss.css

56 ms

ezvideocss.css

ezvideocss.css

56 ms

ccpaplus.js

ccpaplus.js

182 ms

jquery-1.7.0.min.js

jquery-1.7.0.min.js

76 ms

tiny_mce.js

tiny_mce.js

89 ms

editor_plugin2.js

editor_plugin2.js

86 ms

DMCABadgeHelper.min.js

DMCABadgeHelper.min.js

52 ms

offside.min.js

offside.min.js

75 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

70 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

66 ms

back-to-top.min.js

back-to-top.min.js

84 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

86 ms

instantpage.js

instantpage.js

87 ms

v.js

v.js

165 ms

boise.js

boise.js

147 ms

abilene.js

abilene.js

193 ms

tulsa.js

tulsa.js

192 ms

et.js

et.js

176 ms

axolotl.js

axolotl.js

165 ms

lazy_load.js

lazy_load.js

159 ms

Logo-Corrector-App.webp

Logo-Corrector-App.webp

36 ms

tortoise.js

tortoise.js

138 ms

css_onload.js

css_onload.js

143 ms

drake.js

drake.js

151 ms

jellyfish.js

jellyfish.js

163 ms

Corrector-App-Image-2.webp

Corrector-App-Image-2.webp

21 ms

corrector-app-footer.svg

corrector-app-footer.svg

25 ms

gp-premium.woff

gp-premium.woff

28 ms

generatepress.woff

generatepress.woff

68 ms

mulvane.js

mulvane.js

45 ms

wichita.js

wichita.js

79 ms

raleigh.js

raleigh.js

62 ms

vista.js

vista.js

49 ms

screx.js

screx.js

58 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

25 ms

olathe.js

olathe.js

44 ms

vitals.js

vitals.js

41 ms

chanute.js

chanute.js

38 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

13 ms

script_delay.js

script_delay.js

34 ms

Accessibility Review

spellchecker.us accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

spellchecker.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

spellchecker.us SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spellchecker.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spellchecker.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

spellchecker.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Spell Checker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: