2.2 sec in total
454 ms
1.2 sec
525 ms
Click here to check amazing Spellingcow content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about spellingcow.com
free software solutions
Visit spellingcow.comWe analyzed Spellingcow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 454 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
spellingcow.com performance score
454 ms
86 ms
91 ms
99 ms
213 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Spellingcow.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Buttercup.spellingcow.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (454 ms) belongs to the original domain Spellingcow.com.
Page size can be reduced by 101.6 kB (33%)
307.3 kB
205.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Spellingcow.com main page is 307.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 189.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spellingcow images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 44.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spellingcow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (5%)
56
53
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spellingcow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.spellingcow.com
454 ms
ttmain.css
86 ms
index.css
91 ms
ie.css
99 ms
scayt
213 ms
main.css
92 ms
show_ads.js
138 ms
urchin.js
55 ms
tf_home_01bg.jpg
47 ms
ads
43 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
tf_home_spellingcow.jpg
75 ms
affiliateprogram_mainban-02.jpg
50 ms
tf_home_02bg.jpg
57 ms
tf_home_02left.jpg
60 ms
button_home_mo.jpg
63 ms
tf_home_04bg.jpg
66 ms
button_download.jpg
88 ms
button_forums.jpg
95 ms
button_licensing.jpg
99 ms
button_advertising.jpg
103 ms
home_white_red.jpg
107 ms
tf_home_15bg.jpg
112 ms
tf_home_21bg.jpg
126 ms
frame_01.jpg
132 ms
frame_02bg.jpg
138 ms
frame_03.jpg
143 ms
frame_04bg.jpg
146 ms
frame_06bg.jpg
149 ms
frame_07.jpg
163 ms
frame_08bg.jpg
170 ms
frame_09.jpg
175 ms
thumbs_up.jpg
226 ms
frame_tr.jpg
195 ms
banner_top_02.jpg
197 ms
banner_top_news2.gif
201 ms
banner_top_05bg.jpg
208 ms
banner_top_cow.jpg
221 ms
banner_top_03bg.jpg
233 ms
banner_top_03top.jpg
237 ms
frame_01.jpg
240 ms
frame_02bg.jpg
244 ms
frame_03.jpg
259 ms
frame_04bg.jpg
265 ms
frame_06bg.jpg
275 ms
frame_07.jpg
279 ms
frame_08bg.jpg
267 ms
frame_09.jpg
243 ms
icon_wink.gif
249 ms
icon_biggrin.gif
250 ms
icon_cool.gif
258 ms
banner_top_06.jpg
258 ms
banner_top_07bg.jpg
255 ms
banner_top_07left.jpg
244 ms
banner_archive.jpg
250 ms
bottom_bg.jpg
248 ms
cow_25px.gif
40 ms
spell
102 ms
spellingcow.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spellingcow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Spellingcow.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
spellingcow.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spellingcow. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: