Tools & Wizards About Us
spiderbeam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

spiderbeam.com

Spiderbeam© High Performance Lightweight Antennas

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

294 ms

Resources Loaded

867 ms

Page Rendered

117 ms

spiderbeam.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to spiderbeam.com homepage info - get ready to check Spiderbeam best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about spiderbeam.com

spiderbeam high performance lightweight antennas

Visit spiderbeam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Spiderbeam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 984 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spiderbeam.com performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

spiderbeam.com

294 ms

stylesheet.css

105 ms

spiderbeam.css

261 ms

icon.gif

104 ms

pixel_trans.gif

104 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Spiderbeam.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (305 ms) belongs to the original domain Spiderbeam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.9 kB (70%)

Content Size

30.1 kB

After Optimization

9.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Spiderbeam.com main page is 30.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 13.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 12.9 kB
  • After minification 11.5 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 348 B

  • Original 3.5 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spiderbeam images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spiderbeam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spiderbeam. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

spiderbeam.com

spiderbeam.com

294 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

105 ms

spiderbeam.css

spiderbeam.css

261 ms

icon.gif

icon.gif

104 ms

pixel_trans.gif

pixel_trans.gif

104 ms

icon.gif

icon.gif

203 ms

icon.gif

icon.gif

205 ms

icon.gif

icon.gif

207 ms

icon.gif

icon.gif

206 ms

header_spiderbeam.gif

header_spiderbeam.gif

208 ms

pixel_trans.gif

pixel_trans.gif

212 ms

bg_infoboxheading.gif

bg_infoboxheading.gif

305 ms

fehmarn_klein.jpg

fehmarn_klein.jpg

303 ms

Accessibility Review

spiderbeam.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

spiderbeam.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

spiderbeam.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-15

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spiderbeam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Spiderbeam.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-15. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

spiderbeam.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spiderbeam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: