Tools & Wizards About Us
spiderspider.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

spiderspider.co.uk

SpiderSpider Website Design Bath, Bristol, Frome, Chippenham

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

346 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

394 ms

spiderspider.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit spiderspider.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Spider content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spiderspider.co.uk

website design in bath, bristol,trowbridge,frome,chippenham. SEO, logo design, marketing, video production.

Visit spiderspider.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Spiderspider.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spiderspider.co.uk performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

spiderspider.co.uk

346 ms

mobirise-icons.css

330 ms

bootstrap.min.css

405 ms

bootstrap-grid.min.css

325 ms

bootstrap-reboot.min.css

328 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Spiderspider.co.uk and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Spiderspider.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 156.9 kB (17%)

Content Size

906.8 kB

After Optimization

749.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Spiderspider.co.uk main page is 906.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 648.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 24.2 kB
  • After minification 18.7 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.5 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 40.1 kB

  • Original 648.6 kB
  • After minification 608.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spider images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 150.5 kB
  • After minification 150.5 kB
  • After compression 84.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 44% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 30.0 kB

  • Original 83.4 kB
  • After minification 82.1 kB
  • After compression 53.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spiderspider.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (58%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spider . We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

spiderspider.co.uk

spiderspider.co.uk

346 ms

mobirise-icons.css

mobirise-icons.css

330 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

405 ms

bootstrap-grid.min.css

bootstrap-grid.min.css

325 ms

bootstrap-reboot.min.css

bootstrap-reboot.min.css

328 ms

tether.min.css

tether.min.css

324 ms

style.css

style.css

331 ms

style.css

style.css

644 ms

mbr-additional.css

mbr-additional.css

723 ms

301.black-logo-500x125.jpg

301.black-logo-500x125.jpg

720 ms

321m.websites-montage-444x444.jpg

321m.websites-montage-444x444.jpg

793 ms

230m.bus-cards.logos-montage-444x444.jpg

230m.bus-cards.logos-montage-444x444.jpg

802 ms

237.art-of-identity-444x444.jpg

237.art-of-identity-444x444.jpg

794 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

958 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1113 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1124 ms

tether.min.js

tether.min.js

2780 ms

smooth-scroll.js

smooth-scroll.js

1123 ms

nav-dropdown.js

nav-dropdown.js

1123 ms

navbar-dropdown.js

navbar-dropdown.js

1265 ms

jquery.touch-swipe.min.js

jquery.touch-swipe.min.js

1428 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

1434 ms

bootstrap-carousel-swipe.js

bootstrap-carousel-swipe.js

1438 ms

mbr-clients-slider.js

mbr-clients-slider.js

1437 ms

script.js

script.js

2776 ms

994s.iwdro-logo-p-inverted-colour-lowres-147x84.jpg

994s.iwdro-logo-p-inverted-colour-lowres-147x84.jpg

1743 ms

031.ukwda.big.gif

031.ukwda.big.gif

1755 ms

800.bark.elete-certificate-773x490.jpg

800.bark.elete-certificate-773x490.jpg

1827 ms

983.which-web-design-co-logo-199x53.jpg

983.which-web-design-co-logo-199x53.jpg

1748 ms

430.facebook-logo-1403x1258.png

430.facebook-logo-1403x1258.png

2217 ms

321.wesites-montage-1500x1300.jpg

321.wesites-montage-1500x1300.jpg

1663 ms

413.background-1398x647.jpg

413.background-1398x647.jpg

1500 ms

mobirise-icons.ttf

mobirise-icons.ttf

1514 ms

Accessibility Review

spiderspider.co.uk accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

spiderspider.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

spiderspider.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spiderspider.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Spiderspider.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

spiderspider.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spider . Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: