Tools & Wizards About Us
spiderweave.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

spiderweave.com

Miva Merchant Web Hosting, Content Management System, CMS | SpiderWeave.com |

Page Load Speed

22.8 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

21.4 sec

Page Rendered

117 ms

spiderweave.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to spiderweave.com homepage info - get ready to check Spider Weave best content right away, or after learning these important things about spiderweave.com

SpiderWeave is a full service web design, development and hosting company located in Pa's Pocono Mountains specializing in e commerce and content management systems.

Visit spiderweave.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Spiderweave.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 21.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

spiderweave.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.091

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

spiderweave.com

1195 ms

style.css

90 ms

frontend.css

46 ms

style.min.css

71 ms

fancybox.css

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Spiderweave.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Adobe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 457.2 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

986.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Spiderweave.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 643.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 55.3 kB

  • Original 71.8 kB
  • After minification 68.1 kB
  • After compression 16.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 96.5 kB

  • Original 626.3 kB
  • After minification 529.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Spider Weave needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 219.1 kB

  • Original 643.6 kB
  • After minification 641.8 kB
  • After compression 424.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 219.1 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 86.3 kB

  • Original 102.3 kB
  • After minification 82.9 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spiderweave.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (68%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spider Weave. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

spiderweave.com

spiderweave.com

1195 ms

style.css

style.css

90 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

46 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

71 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

71 ms

style.css

style.css

49 ms

in.js

in.js

33 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

89 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

69 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

73 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

214 ms

plugin.css

plugin.css

150 ms

datatables.css

datatables.css

150 ms

script.js

script.js

151 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

150 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

129 ms

seal.js

seal.js

133 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

84 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

81 ms

collect

collect

89 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

168 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

75 ms

get_flash_player.gif

get_flash_player.gif

20057 ms

secure90x72.gif

secure90x72.gif

62 ms

TRUSTe-Privacy-Policy-Logo.png

TRUSTe-Privacy-Policy-Logo.png

85 ms

Bottom_texture.jpg

Bottom_texture.jpg

45 ms

header.png

header.png

119 ms

header-object.png

header-object.png

111 ms

nav.png

nav.png

45 ms

menuseparator.png

menuseparator.png

44 ms

menuitem.png

menuitem.png

44 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

109 ms

subitem.png

subitem.png

109 ms

sheet_b.png

sheet_b.png

109 ms

sheet_t.png

sheet_t.png

108 ms

sheet.png

sheet.png

117 ms

vmenublock_b.png

vmenublock_b.png

118 ms

vmenublock_t.png

vmenublock_t.png

117 ms

vmenublock.png

vmenublock.png

117 ms

vmenublockheader.png

vmenublockheader.png

117 ms

vmenuitem.png

vmenuitem.png

197 ms

block_b.png

block_b.png

195 ms

block_t.png

block_t.png

195 ms

block.png

block.png

195 ms

blockcontent_b.png

blockcontent_b.png

195 ms

blockcontent_t.png

blockcontent_t.png

195 ms

blockcontent.png

blockcontent.png

211 ms

preferred_reseller.gif

preferred_reseller.gif

211 ms

blockheader.png

blockheader.png

210 ms

blockcontentbullets.png

blockcontentbullets.png

210 ms

iStock_000017003347XSmall.jpg

iStock_000017003347XSmall.jpg

243 ms

software2.png

software2.png

245 ms

specificfeeds_follow.png

specificfeeds_follow.png

236 ms

email.png

email.png

235 ms

footer_b.png

footer_b.png

234 ms

footer.png

footer.png

235 ms

rss.png

rss.png

261 ms

rssicon.png

rssicon.png

262 ms

facebook_32.png

facebook_32.png

261 ms

twitter_32.png

twitter_32.png

262 ms

BNI.png

BNI.png

266 ms

js

js

133 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

34 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

41 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

40 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

36 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

6 ms

68 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

110 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

651 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

103 ms

1005847222-postmessagerelay.js

1005847222-postmessagerelay.js

31 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

8 ms

settings

settings

96 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

6 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

23 ms

embeds

embeds

34 ms

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

31 ms

Accessibility Review

spiderweave.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

spiderweave.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

spiderweave.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spiderweave.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spiderweave.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

spiderweave.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spider Weave. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: