7.3 sec in total
820 ms
5.9 sec
586 ms
Click here to check amazing Spider Web content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about spiderweb.technology
Spider Web Group is an innovative company located in Hong Kong
Visit spiderweb.technologyWe analyzed Spiderweb.technology page load time and found that the first response time was 820 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
spiderweb.technology performance score
820 ms
1451 ms
26 ms
522 ms
738 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Spiderweb.technology, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Spiderweb.technology.
Page size can be reduced by 803.0 kB (27%)
3.0 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Spiderweb.technology main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Spider Web needs image optimization as it can save up to 244.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 307.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 224.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spiderweb.technology needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 224.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (63%)
51
19
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spider Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
spiderweb.technology
820 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1451 ms
css
26 ms
animate.css
522 ms
prettyPhoto.css
738 ms
flexslider.css
505 ms
style.css
532 ms
supersized.css
533 ms
supersized.shutter.css
761 ms
custom-icons.css
795 ms
custom-icons-ie7.css
1080 ms
layout.css
1309 ms
colors.css
1002 ms
modernizr-2.6.1.min.js
1255 ms
respond.min.js
807 ms
jquery.min.js
1737 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.js
1065 ms
bootstrap.js
1606 ms
bootstrap-carousel-ie.js
1290 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1321 ms
supersized.3.2.7.min.js
1311 ms
supersized.shutter.min.js
1437 ms
responsive-nav.min.js
1504 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1555 ms
jquery.sharrre-1.3.4.min.js
1580 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1677 ms
jquery.form.js
1999 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1799 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
2097 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.3.1-min.js
1860 ms
jquery.localscroll-1.2.7-min.js
1920 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
1977 ms
SmoothScroll.js
2045 ms
custom.js
2375 ms
loader.gif
930 ms
main-logo.png
1000 ms
infographics-1.png
2512 ms
infographics-2.png
2530 ms
infographics-3.png
2432 ms
paralax-1.jpg
1904 ms
services.png
2281 ms
paralax-2.jpg
2434 ms
image.php
3018 ms
footer-logo.png
2542 ms
footer-work1.png
2692 ms
footer-work2.png
2694 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
5 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
9 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
20 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
21 ms
custom-icons.woff
2732 ms
resp_nav_btn.png
1071 ms
progress.gif
1094 ms
supersized-3.jpg
1776 ms
supersized-1.jpg
2023 ms
supersized-2.jpg
2059 ms
ga.js
33 ms
spiderweb.technology SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spiderweb.technology can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spiderweb.technology main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spiderweb.technology
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spider Web. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: