8.9 sec in total
1.8 sec
6.7 sec
517 ms
Visit spiga.ch now to see the best up-to-date Spiga content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spiga.ch
Carnets de terrain et portfolios de photographies naturalistes et animalières réalisées au Val-de-Travers et environs par Fabian Spigariol
Visit spiga.chWe analyzed Spiga.ch page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
spiga.ch performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value34.7 s
0/100
25%
Value57.2 s
0/100
10%
Value33,480 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value57.6 s
0/100
10%
1752 ms
280 ms
189 ms
283 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Spiga.ch, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Spiga.ch.
Page size can be reduced by 957.8 kB (31%)
3.1 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Spiga.ch main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spiga images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 406.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 406.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 462.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spiga.ch needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 462.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (84%)
77
12
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spiga. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.spiga.ch
1752 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
280 ms
styles.css
189 ms
settings.css
283 ms
reset.css
189 ms
wordpress.css
190 ms
animation.css
250 ms
ilightbox.css
285 ms
custom.css
371 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
374 ms
flexslider.css
345 ms
tooltipster.css
373 ms
odometer-theme-minimal.css
375 ms
hw-parallax.css
377 ms
screen.css
714 ms
css
68 ms
font-awesome.min.css
553 ms
custom-css.php
1402 ms
grid.css
641 ms
css
41 ms
kirki-styles.css
459 ms
jetpack.css
645 ms
stats-css.css
553 ms
jquery.js
921 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
654 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
919 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
828 ms
external-tracking.min.js
741 ms
counter.css
800 ms
no-right-click-images.js
695 ms
supersized.css
756 ms
supersized.shutter.css
782 ms
tg_frame.css
790 ms
photon.js
851 ms
jquery.form.min.js
871 ms
scripts.js
872 ms
postviews-cache.js
875 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
7 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
882 ms
e-201611.js
7 ms
jquery.requestAnimationFrame.js
941 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
937 ms
ilightbox.packed.js
1026 ms
jquery.easing.js
938 ms
waypoints.min.js
886 ms
jquery.isotope.js
918 ms
skin.css
933 ms
skin.css
936 ms
skin.css
884 ms
skin.css
920 ms
skin.css
935 ms
skin.css
935 ms
skin.css
940 ms
jquery.masory.js
948 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
918 ms
hw-parallax.js
845 ms
custom_plugins.js
892 ms
custom.js
824 ms
wp-embed.min.js
815 ms
supersized.3.2.7.min.js
871 ms
supersized.shutter.min.js
806 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
784 ms
script-supersized-gallery.php
1652 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
kirki-styles.css
204 ms
logo_spiga_photography.png
305 ms
collect
42 ms
not.gif
146 ms
kTMXe27D52FqpQ32NwtmSA.ttf
39 ms
zyp4YJBZ_lxKXbxiOB0aXfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
205 ms
hBSGTdn0GPotfi2zAbmAcgLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
241 ms
OFIZAvwH-z38ZAmKrzlOQQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
241 ms
RNK880-gAQqEsu_op2esB6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
139 ms
q-zW-Zo1WVPbcxjiOfEkYgLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
227 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgWW7E_Sgf7gK0X2GrG4H9g.ttf
125 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcsBaWKZ57bY3RXgXH6dOjZ0.ttf
228 ms
Kqy6-utIpx_30Xzecmeo83YhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
124 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
228 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
380 ms
admin-ajax.php
1318 ms
hovercard.css
71 ms
services.css
72 ms
314-Jeune-marmotte-%C3%A0-la-sortie-de-son-terrier-11-mai-20151.jpg
927 ms
013-24-mai-2015-2.jpg
838 ms
016-Li%C3%A8vre-de-mars-26-juillet-2012.jpg
1019 ms
g.gif
23 ms
loading.gif
97 ms
spiga.ch accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
spiga.ch best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
spiga.ch SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spiga.ch can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spiga.ch main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spiga.ch
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Spiga. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: