448 ms in total
83 ms
280 ms
85 ms
Click here to check amazing SPIguard content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about spiguard.com
SPIguard Inc. specializes in web application/network security consulting and PCI/PA DSS compliance validation services.
Visit spiguard.comWe analyzed Spiguard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 365 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
spiguard.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value2.3 s
98/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.39
26/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
83 ms
27 ms
40 ms
42 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Spiguard.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (101 ms) belongs to the original domain Spiguard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 201.4 kB (54%)
376.2 kB
174.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Spiguard.com main page is 376.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 220.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SPIguard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 156.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spiguard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (68%)
38
12
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SPIguard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
index.php
83 ms
styles.css
27 ms
default.css
40 ms
hacks.css
42 ms
touch_tracking.js
43 ms
common_functions.min.js
44 ms
jquery.js
71 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
43 ms
tabs_slides.js
54 ms
tabs_slides_opt_loader.js
55 ms
earthybrown.css
70 ms
responsive.css
56 ms
domtab.js
57 ms
js
58 ms
slideshow.js
57 ms
style2.css
58 ms
jquery.form.min.js
97 ms
scripts.js
99 ms
smooth.js
101 ms
dim.js
100 ms
brown_bg.jpg
43 ms
logo.jpg
43 ms
seal.jpg
42 ms
navbar_bg.jpg
43 ms
current_page_item_bg.jpg
44 ms
submit.png
44 ms
hamburger.png
45 ms
twitter.png
45 ms
dragoncart_logo.jpg
46 ms
examine_binary-300x215.jpg
47 ms
audit_checklist-300x200.jpg
47 ms
pin_pad-300x199.jpg
47 ms
headline_right.gif
47 ms
arrow.gif
48 ms
rss_icon.svg
48 ms
icon_phone.gif
49 ms
icon_fax.gif
49 ms
icon_email.gif
50 ms
info-email.gif
55 ms
spiguard.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
spiguard.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
spiguard.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spiguard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spiguard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spiguard.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SPIguard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: