Tools & Wizards About Us
spinetechnologies.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 69

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

spinetechnologies.com

HRMS Payroll Software - Best HRMS Payroll Software for india

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

316 ms

spinetechnologies.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to spinetechnologies.com homepage info - get ready to check Spinetechnologies best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about spinetechnologies.com

The Best HRMS Software HRMS and HRIS, Payroll and Fixed Assets Management software and automation provider in India - Spine Technologies

Visit spinetechnologies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Spinetechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spinetechnologies.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value32.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,180 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.244

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

spinetechnologies.com

1078 ms

font-awesome.min.css

569 ms

bootstrap.min.css

823 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

564 ms

rs-style.css

565 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Spinetechnologies.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Spinetechnologies.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 913.2 kB (53%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

797.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Spinetechnologies.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 672.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 59.0 kB

  • Original 67.7 kB
  • After minification 43.5 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.3 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 117.6 kB

  • Original 672.4 kB
  • After minification 554.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Spinetechnologies needs image optimization as it can save up to 117.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 322.2 kB

  • Original 472.8 kB
  • After minification 464.1 kB
  • After compression 150.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 322.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 414.4 kB

  • Original 498.0 kB
  • After minification 463.3 kB
  • After compression 83.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spinetechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 414.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (45%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

41

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spinetechnologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

spinetechnologies.com

spinetechnologies.com

1078 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

569 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

823 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

564 ms

rs-style.css

rs-style.css

565 ms

settings.css

settings.css

580 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

565 ms

style-metronic.css

style-metronic.css

840 ms

style.css

style.css

1077 ms

blue.css

blue.css

856 ms

style-responsive.css

style-responsive.css

837 ms

custom.css

custom.css

843 ms

prices.css

prices.css

1086 ms

logo_blue.png

logo_blue.png

1079 ms

bg9.jpg

bg9.jpg

1368 ms

new_ProdE.jpg

new_ProdE.jpg

1958 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

1404 ms

DeepDomain.png

DeepDomain.png

1835 ms

bg2.jpg

bg2.jpg

1579 ms

mac.png

mac.png

1599 ms

ipad.png

ipad.png

1651 ms

iphone.png

iphone.png

1684 ms

macbook.png

macbook.png

2081 ms

hint1-blue.png

hint1-blue.png

1860 ms

hint2-blue.png

hint2-blue.png

1917 ms

bg4.jpg

bg4.jpg

1960 ms

iphone_left.png

iphone_left.png

2101 ms

iphone_right.png

iphone_right.png

2369 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

2211 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

1991 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

2014 ms

back-to-top.js

back-to-top.js

2090 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

2125 ms

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

2259 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

2302 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

2351 ms

app.js

app.js

2387 ms

dGYzWwmUf9k

dGYzWwmUf9k

95 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

23 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

43 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

49 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

90 ms

index.js

index.js

2080 ms

new_img2.jpg

new_img2.jpg

2197 ms

new_img1.jpg

new_img1.jpg

2252 ms

NL.png

NL.png

2267 ms

MC.png

MC.png

2275 ms

RC.png

RC.png

2059 ms

crisil.png

crisil.png

2062 ms

tin.png

tin.png

2193 ms

client_1.png

client_1.png

2269 ms

client_2.png

client_2.png

2376 ms

font.css

font.css

2037 ms

client_3.png

client_3.png

2152 ms

client_4.png

client_4.png

2147 ms

client_5.png

client_5.png

2021 ms

client_6.png

client_6.png

1999 ms

client_7.png

client_7.png

1827 ms

client_8.png

client_8.png

1809 ms

timer.png

timer.png

261 ms

corners-blue.png

corners-blue.png

317 ms

arrow-testimonials.png

arrow-testimonials.png

443 ms

left.png

left.png

515 ms

right.png

right.png

500 ms

one.png

one.png

528 ms

dGYzWwmUf9k

dGYzWwmUf9k

69 ms

up.png

up.png

279 ms

black-opacity.png

black-opacity.png

302 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

485 ms

left.png

left.png

506 ms

right.png

right.png

540 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

539 ms

shadow1.png

shadow1.png

567 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

565 ms

arrow_left.png

arrow_left.png

738 ms

arrow_right.png

arrow_right.png

750 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

794 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

816 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

817 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

839 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1009 ms

dGYzWwmUf9k

dGYzWwmUf9k

86 ms

Accessibility Review

spinetechnologies.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

spinetechnologies.com best practices score

69

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

spinetechnologies.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spinetechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spinetechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

spinetechnologies.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spinetechnologies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: