Tools & Wizards About Us
splitcreek.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

splitcreek.com

Split Creek Farm LLC Goat Dairy Anderson, SC

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

885 ms

Page Rendered

56 ms

splitcreek.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to splitcreek.com homepage info - get ready to check Split Creek best content right away, or after learning these important things about splitcreek.com

Split Creek Farm - Grade A Goat Dairy located in Anderson, SC.

Visit splitcreek.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Splitcreek.com page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 941 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

splitcreek.com performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.splitcreek.com

71 ms

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

29 ms

polyfill.min.js

26 ms

thunderbolt-commons.718dbdea.bundle.min.js

102 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Splitcreek.com, 50% (19 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 39% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (113 ms) relates to the external source Static.parastorage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 687.0 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

622.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Splitcreek.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 749.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 609.3 kB

  • Original 749.4 kB
  • After minification 747.7 kB
  • After compression 140.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 609.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

  • Original 271.4 kB
  • After minification 241.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Split Creek needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 288.6 kB
  • After minification 288.6 kB
  • After compression 240.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (29%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Split Creek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.splitcreek.com

www.splitcreek.com

71 ms

minified.js

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

29 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

26 ms

thunderbolt-commons.718dbdea.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.718dbdea.bundle.min.js

102 ms

main.a041a540.bundle.min.js

main.a041a540.bundle.min.js

101 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

100 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

102 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

101 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

103 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

113 ms

47095326_10157898989513362_4455104627645349888_n.jpg

47095326_10157898989513362_4455104627645349888_n.jpg

65 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

50 ms

74b0d0_5723bdcdf92d438b9ebd32f9d58e75f0~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_5723bdcdf92d438b9ebd32f9d58e75f0~mv2.jpg

66 ms

74b0d0_51892ff251184b98a17ae386c425ff01~mv2.png

74b0d0_51892ff251184b98a17ae386c425ff01~mv2.png

66 ms

Good%20Food%20Awards%20Winner%20Seal%202017.jpg

Good%20Food%20Awards%20Winner%20Seal%202017.jpg

34 ms

74b0d0_503514d23ae646dbafc942c2ad26c6ea~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_503514d23ae646dbafc942c2ad26c6ea~mv2.jpg

35 ms

74b0d0_ac93d02278da4e40ac8e129ea6dd491a~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_ac93d02278da4e40ac8e129ea6dd491a~mv2.jpg

67 ms

74b0d0_9dd1a90a48974cd1902600eb199ae6fa~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_9dd1a90a48974cd1902600eb199ae6fa~mv2.jpg

65 ms

74b0d0_6fb46063648344c691ea59a697995f53~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_6fb46063648344c691ea59a697995f53~mv2.jpg

66 ms

74b0d0_269462d579f846ee8f47c745fa4e002a~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_269462d579f846ee8f47c745fa4e002a~mv2.jpg

67 ms

74b0d0_99f578014e6741d1bd7b8bd29ad8d502~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_99f578014e6741d1bd7b8bd29ad8d502~mv2.jpg

67 ms

74b0d0_80fd9a05922a412695dfa81db5fc3961~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_80fd9a05922a412695dfa81db5fc3961~mv2.jpg

68 ms

74b0d0_34f3239119e44c4994bd342d0ab726ca~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_34f3239119e44c4994bd342d0ab726ca~mv2.jpg

68 ms

74b0d0_71cf9b1b522549f383f7394a99518c12~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_71cf9b1b522549f383f7394a99518c12~mv2.jpg

70 ms

74b0d0_d1ad07ca8c9a40289d3714d337ee18e5~mv2.png

74b0d0_d1ad07ca8c9a40289d3714d337ee18e5~mv2.png

69 ms

74b0d0_2ac07883b8ee40879fd6dddf7a483287~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_2ac07883b8ee40879fd6dddf7a483287~mv2.jpg

69 ms

74b0d0_9b669962f66948c0bcbc703c8d32102d~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_9b669962f66948c0bcbc703c8d32102d~mv2.jpg

69 ms

74b0d0_95f1f8d37c514138ad1d63f755ce66ab~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_95f1f8d37c514138ad1d63f755ce66ab~mv2.jpg

70 ms

74b0d0_c7a5e04036294e0396e7510b4739c799~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_c7a5e04036294e0396e7510b4739c799~mv2.jpg

70 ms

74b0d0_225a9f5473f143eaa4a708cb39ed469d~mv2.jpg

74b0d0_225a9f5473f143eaa4a708cb39ed469d~mv2.jpg

70 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

9 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

50 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

29 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

41 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

6 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

10 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

6 ms

Accessibility Review

splitcreek.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

splitcreek.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

splitcreek.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Splitcreek.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Splitcreek.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

splitcreek.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Split Creek. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: