5.2 sec in total
2 sec
2.7 sec
462 ms
Click here to check amazing Sqlfool content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sqlfool.com
Visit sqlfool.comWe analyzed Sqlfool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
sqlfool.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value1,600 ms
12/100
30%
Value1.978
0/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
2007 ms
115 ms
391 ms
133 ms
522 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Sqlfool.com, 26% (18 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 15% (10 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sqlfool.com.
Page size can be reduced by 317.6 kB (69%)
459.1 kB
141.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Sqlfool.com main page is 459.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 199.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 179.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.2 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sqlfool images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sqlfool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (55%)
66
30
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sqlfool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sqlfool.com
2007 ms
wp-syntax.css
115 ms
style.css
391 ms
socialize.css
133 ms
jquery.js
522 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
224 ms
frontend.js
223 ms
jquery.form.min.js
297 ms
wp-wall.js
280 ms
wp-wall.css
300 ms
ga.js
17 ms
back2top.png
70 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
like.php
135 ms
like.php
122 ms
like.php
126 ms
like.php
113 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
34 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
23 ms
like.php
113 ms
like.php
102 ms
like.php
232 ms
like.php
99 ms
square_dark.png
84 ms
widgets.js
4 ms
widgets.js
4 ms
in.js
10 ms
plusone.js
246 ms
style-mobile.css
245 ms
like.php
282 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
28 ms
share
243 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
251 ms
share
237 ms
share
278 ms
share
307 ms
share
322 ms
share
266 ms
share
273 ms
share
247 ms
share
231 ms
share
207 ms
plusone.js
116 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
34 ms
like.php
153 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
17 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
57 ms
info.json
143 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
35 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
54 ms
fastbutton
123 ms
fastbutton
121 ms
fastbutton
157 ms
fastbutton
155 ms
fastbutton
132 ms
fastbutton
151 ms
fastbutton
236 ms
fastbutton
233 ms
fastbutton
230 ms
fastbutton
246 ms
postmessageRelay
81 ms
rs=AGLTcCMnDeXbzq1T_DzqIKnxZkbM5OL1-w
41 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
114 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
104 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
98 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
94 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
69 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
22 ms
sqlfool.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sqlfool.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sqlfool.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sqlfool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Sqlfool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sqlfool.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sqlfool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: