Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

squidge.org

Squidge.org, a Space for Fandom because Fandom deserves a Space

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

993 ms

Page Rendered

174 ms

squidge.org screenshot

About Website

Visit squidge.org now to see the best up-to-date Squidge content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about squidge.org

Wolf Website Designer Template. This is a responsive, mobile-friendly web page template.

Visit squidge.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Squidge.org page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

squidge.org performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.062

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

squidge.org

192 ms

squidge.org

377 ms

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

22 ms

bootstrap.min.css

44 ms

bootstrap.min.js

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Squidge.org, 25% (3 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 25% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (421 ms) belongs to the original domain Squidge.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 211.8 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

852.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Squidge.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 992.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 31.4 kB

  • Original 35.2 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 152.0 kB

  • Original 992.9 kB
  • After minification 841.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Squidge needs image optimization as it can save up to 152.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 28.4 kB

  • Original 36.0 kB
  • After minification 30.7 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Squidge.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Squidge. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

squidge.org accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

squidge.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

squidge.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Squidge.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Squidge.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Squidge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: