Tools & Wizards About Us
srv.media screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

srv.media

Digital Marketing Agency - ISO Certified - SRV Media, Pune

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

19 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

srv.media screenshot

About Website

Visit srv.media now to see the best up-to-date SRV content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about srv.media

Let’s amplify your 12+ years of expertise across various digital marketing platforms sparks success for brands! With a result-driven approach, we work as a full-services partner. From data-driven insi...

Visit srv.media

Key Findings

We analyzed Srv.media page load time and found that the first response time was 19 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

srv.media performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,650 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.267

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

srv.media

19 ms

www.srvmedia.com

539 ms

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

32 ms

two_front_page_minified_main.min.js

473 ms

swiper.min.js

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Srv.media, 94% (49 requests) were made to Srvmedia.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Srvmedia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 949.7 kB (44%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Srv.media main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 949.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 105.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 949.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 68 B
  • After minification 68 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SRV images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 508 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 1.1 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (87%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SRV. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

srv.media

srv.media

19 ms

www.srvmedia.com

www.srvmedia.com

539 ms

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

32 ms

two_front_page_minified_main.min.js

two_front_page_minified_main.min.js

473 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

92 ms

srv.svg

srv.svg

58 ms

final-banner-1-1.png

final-banner-1-1.png

92 ms

banner-mobile-version.webp

banner-mobile-version.webp

429 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

373 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

42 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

72 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

361 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

81 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

90 ms

two_front_page_minified_custom.min.js

two_front_page_minified_custom.min.js

99 ms

mowpforms.min.js

mowpforms.min.js

109 ms

9f5b6212fb8c6f8847048f64b3490842.min.js

9f5b6212fb8c6f8847048f64b3490842.min.js

122 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

125 ms

wpforms-conditional-logic-fields.min.js

wpforms-conditional-logic-fields.min.js

142 ms

choices.min.js

choices.min.js

145 ms

zxcvbn-async.min.js

zxcvbn-async.min.js

161 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

169 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

182 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

188 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

201 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

204 ms

password-strength-meter.min.js

password-strength-meter.min.js

220 ms

password.min.js

password.min.js

1376 ms

jquery.intl-tel-input.min.js

jquery.intl-tel-input.min.js

247 ms

dropzone.min.js

dropzone.min.js

267 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

286 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

306 ms

wpforms-file-upload.es5.min.js

wpforms-file-upload.es5.min.js

327 ms

jquery.payment.min.js

jquery.payment.min.js

347 ms

richtext.min.js

richtext.min.js

379 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

363 ms

jquery.inputmask.min.js

jquery.inputmask.min.js

378 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

387 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

398 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

393 ms

wpforms-modern.min.js

wpforms-modern.min.js

376 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

382 ms

jquery.timepicker.min.js

jquery.timepicker.min.js

353 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

661 ms

two_bg_vanilla.js

two_bg_vanilla.js

365 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1948 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1531 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

699 ms

previous.webp

previous.webp

26 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1600 ms

output.js

output.js

123 ms

zxcvbn.min.js

zxcvbn.min.js

48 ms

Accessibility Review

srv.media accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

srv.media best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

srv.media SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Srv.media can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Srv.media main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

srv.media

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SRV. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: