Tools & Wizards About Us
ssg.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

ssg.us

Sentinel Security Group, LLC

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

678 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

237 ms

ssg.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ssg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ssg.us

Sentinel Security Group, LLC North Louisiana's largest security service provider specializing in armed guard services armed courier services surveillance

Visit ssg.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Ssg.us page load time and found that the first response time was 678 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ssg.us performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,420 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.123

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ssg.us

678 ms

style.css

131 ms

style.min.css

170 ms

styles.css

113 ms

cf7msm.css

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Ssg.us, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Seal-shreveport.bbb.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (678 ms) belongs to the original domain Ssg.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 672.6 kB (18%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ssg.us main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 29.0 kB

  • Original 38.0 kB
  • After minification 32.6 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 350.4 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ssg needs image optimization as it can save up to 350.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 180.1 kB

  • Original 491.5 kB
  • After minification 462.6 kB
  • After compression 311.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 180.1 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 113.1 kB

  • Original 135.2 kB
  • After minification 111.9 kB
  • After compression 22.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ssg.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (45%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ssg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ssg.us

ssg.us

678 ms

style.css

style.css

131 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

170 ms

styles.css

styles.css

113 ms

cf7msm.css

cf7msm.css

90 ms

style.css

style.css

89 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

97 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

243 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

153 ms

apbct-public.min.js

apbct-public.min.js

167 ms

cleantalk_nocache.min.js

cleantalk_nocache.min.js

166 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

186 ms

public.css

public.css

211 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

213 ms

cf7msm.min.js

cf7msm.min.js

201 ms

api.js

api.js

38 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

277 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

229 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

277 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

128 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

js

js

87 ms

sentinel-security-group-90048790.png

sentinel-security-group-90048790.png

55 ms

bkgd_image3.jpg

bkgd_image3.jpg

185 ms

bkgd_top_nav.png

bkgd_top_nav.png

150 ms

sentinel_security_logo6.png

sentinel_security_logo6.png

105 ms

banner_sentinel-resized.jpg

banner_sentinel-resized.jpg

183 ms

banner_secret_security4-resized.jpg

banner_secret_security4-resized.jpg

128 ms

banner_secret_security3-resized.jpg

banner_secret_security3-resized.jpg

122 ms

banner_secret_security2-resized.jpg

banner_secret_security2-resized.jpg

197 ms

banner_secret_security-resized.jpg

banner_secret_security-resized.jpg

184 ms

banner_pi-resized.jpg

banner_pi-resized.jpg

194 ms

banner_logo-resized.jpg

banner_logo-resized.jpg

201 ms

banner_images_unarmed_security-resized.jpg

banner_images_unarmed_security-resized.jpg

246 ms

banner_images_newtraining-resized.jpg

banner_images_newtraining-resized.jpg

239 ms

banner_images_armed_security-resized.jpg

banner_images_armed_security-resized.jpg

247 ms

banner_flag-resized.jpg

banner_flag-resized.jpg

257 ms

image_sub_area.png

image_sub_area.png

265 ms

image_sub_area1.png

image_sub_area1.png

266 ms

image_sub_area2.png

image_sub_area2.png

277 ms

image_sub_area3.png

image_sub_area3.png

295 ms

bkgd_content1.png

bkgd_content1.png

293 ms

about_banner.png

about_banner.png

376 ms

services_banner.png

services_banner.png

392 ms

training_banner.png

training_banner.png

394 ms

sentinel_security_logo.png

sentinel_security_logo.png

326 ms

sentinel-security-group-90048790.js

sentinel-security-group-90048790.js

22 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

31 ms

legacy.min.css

legacy.min.css

6 ms

Accessibility Review

ssg.us accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ssg.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ssg.us SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ssg.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ssg.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ssg.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ssg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: