Tools & Wizards About Us
staciecarr.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

staciecarr.com

Stacie Carr

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

517 ms

Page Rendered

611 ms

staciecarr.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to staciecarr.com homepage info - get ready to check Stacie Carr best content right away, or after learning these important things about staciecarr.com

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan and Vancouver, British Columbia Wedding Photographer. Available for Travel.

Visit staciecarr.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Staciecarr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

staciecarr.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.011

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.staciecarr.com

61 ms

jGdggnur_hw7aBgYCfJ2nGSpLhnMeCUX4rD6-c9t4f6feG92fFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9aFcmRjcJowRM35Q885QSaZ2gRwcFRZg7-MPG0Sasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUCdhFydeyzSabCSasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUDieBR-AmRjW4kOcFzdPUaiaS0Sasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUaiaS0Sasyjh88jhBkSKoRdhXK2hZkZA81-Ybljc81OWgkdkJJjW40dku3ScvKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifGHfOHbMsMMeMb6MKGHfO-bMsMMeM96MKGHfOKbMsMMeMj6MKGHfOfbMsMMeMS6MKGHfO5bMsMMeMt6MKGHfOpbMsMMeMv6MKGHfOebMsMMegI6MKG4fHufIMIjgfMfH6qJyB9bMy6IJMJ7fbRxmgMfeM96MKG4fJBmIMJjgkMfH6qJym9bMy65JMJ7fbKfmsMfegI6MTMgzExXX69.js

34 ms

legacy.js

6 ms

modern.js

9 ms

extract-css-runtime-d7a5c3a8f67d92b3f2dd-min.en-US.js

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Staciecarr.com, 41% (14 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 35% (12 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (206 ms) belongs to the original domain Staciecarr.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 141.2 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Staciecarr.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 109.6 kB

  • Original 131.6 kB
  • After minification 113.1 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

  • Original 433.5 kB
  • After minification 407.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stacie Carr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 1.3 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 122 B

  • Original 7.0 kB
  • After minification 7.0 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Staciecarr.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (55%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stacie Carr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.staciecarr.com

www.staciecarr.com

61 ms

jGdggnur_hw7aBgYCfJ2nGSpLhnMeCUX4rD6-c9t4f6feG92fFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9aFcmRjcJowRM35Q885QSaZ2gRwcFRZg7-MPG0Sasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUCdhFydeyzSabCSasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUDieBR-AmRjW4kOcFzdPUaiaS0Sasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUaiaS0Sasyjh88jhBkSKoRdhXK2hZkZA81-Ybljc81OWgkdkJJjW40dku3ScvKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifGHfOHbMsMMeMb6MKGHfO-bMsMMeM96MKGHfOKbMsMMeMj6MKGHfOfbMsMMeMS6MKGHfO5bMsMMeMt6MKGHfOpbMsMMeMv6MKGHfOebMsMMegI6MKG4fHufIMIjgfMfH6qJyB9bMy6IJMJ7fbRxmgMfeM96MKG4fJBmIMJjgkMfH6qJym9bMy65JMJ7fbKfmsMfegI6MTMgzExXX69.js

jGdggnur_hw7aBgYCfJ2nGSpLhnMeCUX4rD6-c9t4f6feG92fFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9aFcmRjcJowRM35Q885QSaZ2gRwcFRZg7-MPG0Sasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUCdhFydeyzSabCSasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUDieBR-AmRjW4kOcFzdPUaiaS0Sasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUaiaS0Sasyjh88jhBkSKoRdhXK2hZkZA81-Ybljc81OWgkdkJJjW40dku3ScvKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifGHfOHbMsMMeMb6MKGHfO-bMsMMeM96MKGHfOKbMsMMeMj6MKGHfOfbMsMMeMS6MKGHfO5bMsMMeMt6MKGHfOpbMsMMeMv6MKGHfOebMsMMegI6MKG4fHufIMIjgfMfH6qJyB9bMy6IJMJ7fbRxmgMfeM96MKG4fJBmIMJjgkMfH6qJym9bMy65JMJ7fbKfmsMfegI6MTMgzExXX69.js

34 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

6 ms

modern.js

modern.js

9 ms

extract-css-runtime-d7a5c3a8f67d92b3f2dd-min.en-US.js

extract-css-runtime-d7a5c3a8f67d92b3f2dd-min.en-US.js

9 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

16 ms

cldr-resource-pack-e85130cf44bc2d365b8b-min.en-US.js

cldr-resource-pack-e85130cf44bc2d365b8b-min.en-US.js

16 ms

common-vendors-stable-b03dd66b7c78e5e40bc7-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-stable-b03dd66b7c78e5e40bc7-min.en-US.js

33 ms

common-vendors-1b88f4e074f355d03593-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-1b88f4e074f355d03593-min.en-US.js

16 ms

common-38c15f3cdda1c007775a-min.en-US.js

common-38c15f3cdda1c007775a-min.en-US.js

33 ms

commerce-588f73df52d6d11b6054-min.en-US.js

commerce-588f73df52d6d11b6054-min.en-US.js

33 ms

commerce-5af416c534ff65a9fbac-min.en-US.css

commerce-5af416c534ff65a9fbac-min.en-US.css

50 ms

performance-eb022691e09e39c54c48-min.en-US.js

performance-eb022691e09e39c54c48-min.en-US.js

52 ms

site.css

site.css

71 ms

site-bundle.js

site-bundle.js

56 ms

stacie+carr-20.png

stacie+carr-20.png

205 ms

ui-icons.svg

ui-icons.svg

206 ms

stacie+carr-08.png

stacie+carr-08.png

80 ms

stacie+carr-12.png

stacie+carr-12.png

45 ms

d

d

52 ms

d

d

68 ms

d

d

94 ms

d

d

75 ms

d

d

105 ms

d

d

76 ms

d

d

75 ms

squarespace-ui-font.svg

squarespace-ui-font.svg

38 ms

d

d

75 ms

d

d

76 ms

d

d

75 ms

d

d

91 ms

d

d

93 ms

d

d

92 ms

p.gif

p.gif

64 ms

Accessibility Review

staciecarr.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

staciecarr.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

staciecarr.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staciecarr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staciecarr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

staciecarr.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stacie Carr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: