4.1 sec in total
228 ms
3.4 sec
416 ms
Visit stackscale.es now to see the best up-to-date Stackscale content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stackscale.es
En Stackscale somos expertos en soluciones de infraestructura y cloud hosting para proyectos que necesitan Alta Disponibilidad y rendimiento.
Visit stackscale.esWe analyzed Stackscale.es page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
stackscale.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value550 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.067
97/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
228 ms
252 ms
199 ms
298 ms
519 ms
Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Stackscale.es, 38% (45 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Stackscale.es.
Page size can be reduced by 588.9 kB (44%)
1.3 MB
734.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Stackscale.es main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 545.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stackscale images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 175.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 175.5 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 345.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stackscale.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 345.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 89 (79%)
112
23
The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stackscale. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 69 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stackscale.es
228 ms
www.stackscale.es
252 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
199 ms
headers.css
298 ms
shortcodes.css
519 ms
flexslider.css
217 ms
prettyPhoto.css
326 ms
style.css
219 ms
responsive.css
299 ms
styles.css
329 ms
cli-style.css
327 ms
flexslider.css
396 ms
css
26 ms
css
38 ms
jquery.js
753 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
432 ms
cookielawinfo.js
492 ms
easing.js
492 ms
fitvids.js
539 ms
js
19 ms
css
44 ms
427 ms
comment-reply.min.js
536 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
588 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
588 ms
shortcodes.js
613 ms
bootstrap.js
644 ms
superfish.js
645 ms
mobilemenu.js
686 ms
waypoints.js
687 ms
waypoints-sticky.js
722 ms
functions.js
751 ms
prettyPhoto.js
752 ms
jquery.tweet.js
785 ms
wp-embed.min.js
786 ms
style.css
726 ms
twitter.png
126 ms
rss.png
126 ms
stackscale-logo.png
131 ms
logo-hi-stackscale-300x71.jpg
129 ms
search.png
130 ms
centrodatosnubes.jpg
1620 ms
grid.png
209 ms
stripes.png
208 ms
rendimiento-predecible.jpg
1619 ms
soluciones-de-mision-critica.jpg
1618 ms
continuidad-de-negocio.jpg
1618 ms
soporte-especializado.jpg
1619 ms
precio-competitivos.jpg
1620 ms
infraestructura-verde.jpg
1619 ms
accordion-open.png
1621 ms
arrow4.png
1571 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
11 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
12 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
13 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
11 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
11 ms
ga.js
19 ms
js
17 ms
bat.js
69 ms
jquery.min.js
80 ms
101 ms
1555 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
overlay.png
1502 ms
collect
81 ms
font-awesome.min.css
55 ms
css
85 ms
css
89 ms
css
104 ms
css
105 ms
css
106 ms
css
107 ms
in.php
1415 ms
dojo.js
22 ms
accordion-close.png
105 ms
registry.js
10 ms
parser.js
19 ms
Dialog.js
28 ms
main.js
17 ms
url.js
27 ms
stamp.js
23 ms
window.js
13 ms
Moveable.js
19 ms
TimedMoveable.js
26 ms
focus.js
21 ms
manager.js
23 ms
_Widget.js
53 ms
_TemplatedMixin.js
25 ms
_CssStateMixin.js
27 ms
_FormMixin.js
30 ms
_DialogMixin.js
28 ms
DialogUnderlay.js
31 ms
ContentPane.js
31 ms
common.js
32 ms
touch.js
22 ms
common.js
24 ms
Mover.js
26 ms
Stateful.js
23 ms
a11y.js
26 ms
_WidgetBase.js
23 ms
string.js
25 ms
cache.js
27 ms
BackgroundIframe.js
18 ms
_Container.js
23 ms
_ContentPaneResizeMixin.js
21 ms
html.js
24 ms
loading.js
41 ms
autoscroll.js
17 ms
retina.css
200 ms
Destroyable.js
10 ms
_OnDijitClickMixin.js
16 ms
_FocusMixin.js
17 ms
uacss.js
17 ms
hccss.js
17 ms
Viewport.js
15 ms
utils.js
17 ms
a11yclick.js
10 ms
hccss.js
15 ms
blank.gif
11 ms
stackscale.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
stackscale.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stackscale.es SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stackscale.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Stackscale.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stackscale.es
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stackscale. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: