3.7 sec in total
271 ms
3.2 sec
184 ms
Visit stadur.com now to see the best up-to-date Stadur content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stadur.com
Visit stadur.comWe analyzed Stadur.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
stadur.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
14/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value730 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.233
53/100
15%
Value15.5 s
7/100
10%
271 ms
499 ms
192 ms
288 ms
918 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Stadur.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (918 ms) belongs to the original domain Stadur.com.
Page size can be reduced by 849.3 kB (44%)
1.9 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Stadur.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 860.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stadur images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 452.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 452.9 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stadur.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (27%)
96
70
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stadur. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stadur.com
271 ms
499 ms
flexslider_styles.css
192 ms
77a975418eee.css
288 ms
22f184add6a3.js
918 ms
css
26 ms
reset_v2.0.css
216 ms
fxSlide.css
221 ms
layout.css
282 ms
nav.css
323 ms
grid.css
322 ms
misc.css
332 ms
slidebars.min.css
377 ms
responsive.css
379 ms
fxSlide.js
434 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
430 ms
slidebars.min.js
442 ms
index.mootools.js
470 ms
index.jquery.js
473 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
546 ms
mediabox.js
339 ms
fbevents.js
117 ms
nav-bg.png
168 ms
arrow-right.png
166 ms
en.png
108 ms
arrow-down.png
162 ms
de.png
160 ms
fr.png
107 ms
ru.png
197 ms
logo-en.png
196 ms
front_final.jpeg
456 ms
badszene_final.jpg
367 ms
Viscom_Slideshow_02a.jpg
365 ms
slideshow-technik-02.jpg
463 ms
01.jpg
292 ms
02.jpg
292 ms
03.jpg
452 ms
04.jpg
453 ms
05.jpg
465 ms
06.jpg
462 ms
07.jpg
480 ms
08.jpg
484 ms
09.jpg
518 ms
10.jpg
572 ms
11.jpg
569 ms
12.jpg
574 ms
13.jpg
575 ms
14.jpg
577 ms
15.jpg
620 ms
16.jpg
677 ms
17.jpg
684 ms
18.jpg
683 ms
19.jpg
668 ms
01-basicboard-raw.jpg
672 ms
02-lineboard-raw.jpg
721 ms
03-gefaelle.jpg
762 ms
04-hightec.jpg
766 ms
05-natureboard.jpg
766 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
75 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
76 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
75 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
76 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
76 ms
ga.js
60 ms
player_api
79 ms
06-lifeboard.jpg
697 ms
07-elegance.jpg
693 ms
__utm.gif
35 ms
50 ms
08-roundwall.jpg
671 ms
09-relax.jpg
702 ms
10-moebel.jpg
705 ms
www-widgetapi.js
32 ms
11-basetec.jpg
735 ms
12-winkel.jpg
720 ms
13-schlitz.jpg
721 ms
Dw8DsGxM2MA
80 ms
14-verlege-nf.jpg
642 ms
01.jpg
667 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
16 ms
www-embed-player.js
34 ms
base.js
64 ms
02.jpg
599 ms
03.jpg
642 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
34 ms
ad_status.js
35 ms
04.jpg
572 ms
05.jpg
574 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
25 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
28 ms
06.jpg
581 ms
01.jpg
593 ms
02.jpg
596 ms
03.jpg
653 ms
04.jpg
656 ms
05.jpg
632 ms
social-facebook.png
621 ms
social-googleplus.png
579 ms
social-youtube.png
580 ms
social-mail.png
649 ms
categories-small.png
673 ms
nav-arrow-gray-right.png
662 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
631 ms
arrow-left.png
574 ms
arrow-right.png
577 ms
stadur.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
stadur.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
stadur.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stadur.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stadur.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stadur.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stadur. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: