2.9 sec in total
76 ms
2.4 sec
445 ms
Welcome to staff.gd homepage info - get ready to check Staff best content right away, or after learning these important things about staff.gd
StaffGarden supports your teams engagement goals with technology built with nurses in mind.
Visit staff.gdWe analyzed Staff.gd page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
staff.gd performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value1,630 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value20.0 s
2/100
10%
76 ms
20 ms
670 ms
37 ms
46 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Staff.gd, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Images.staffgarden.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Load.sumome.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (72%)
1.6 MB
454.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Staff.gd main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 685.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Staff needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 473.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 473.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 602.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Staff.gd needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 602.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (60%)
62
25
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.staffgarden.com
76 ms
staffgarden.com
20 ms
staffgarden.com
670 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
37 ms
switch-style.css
46 ms
wp_head.css
67 ms
form.min.css
72 ms
css
93 ms
css
160 ms
style.css
112 ms
shortcodes.css
66 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
64 ms
magnific_popup.css
63 ms
font-awesome.min.css
50 ms
staffgarden.com
272 ms
jquery.js
158 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
99 ms
load.sumome.com
1114 ms
sg.css
412 ms
sg.js
407 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
131 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
84 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
132 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
133 ms
custom.js
137 ms
wp_footer.js
133 ms
comment-reply.min.js
135 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
135 ms
waypoints.min.js
137 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
136 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
139 ms
wp-embed.min.js
137 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
138 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
138 ms
count.js
138 ms
fbevents.js
695 ms
staffgarden-logo-m.png
756 ms
section-top-nurse-video-o5.jpg
88 ms
nurse-face-small.png
896 ms
money-icon.png
68 ms
secure-icon.png
67 ms
ease-icon.png
68 ms
StaffGarden_icon_no-leaf_blue1.png
69 ms
phone-icon.png
69 ms
mail-icon.png
71 ms
sociallove-icon.png
70 ms
verified-icon.png
73 ms
oneplace-icon.png
71 ms
format-icon.png
73 ms
link-icon.png
74 ms
notification-icon.png
75 ms
free-icon.png
74 ms
chla-homepage-logo.png
672 ms
sos-homepage-logo.png
672 ms
mira-costa-homepage-logo.png
671 ms
public-profile400x526.jpg
939 ms
section-portfolio-center.png
876 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
370 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
426 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
470 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
469 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
578 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
470 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
577 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
469 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
579 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
576 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
284 ms
loader0.js
460 ms
count.js
494 ms
analytics.js
199 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
51 ms
6337-503-10-3372.js
129 ms
collect
90 ms
36 ms
c
216 ms
collect
70 ms
application2.js
87 ms
staff.gd accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
staff.gd best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
staff.gd SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staff.gd can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staff.gd main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
staff.gd
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Staff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: