Tools & Wizards About Us
staffordclaims.consulting screenshot

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

staffordclaims.consulting

Stafford Claims Consulting LLC - Don Stafford - Insurance Expert Witness - Personal Property Appraisal - Commercial Contents Valuation

Page Load Speed

652 ms in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

481 ms

Page Rendered

105 ms

staffordclaims.consulting screenshot

About Website

Visit staffordclaims.consulting now to see the best up-to-date Stafford Claims content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about staffordclaims.consulting

Don Stafford - Insurance Expert Witness - Personal Property Appraisal - Commercial Contents Valuation

Visit staffordclaims.consulting

Key Findings

We analyzed Staffordclaims.consulting page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 586 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

staffordclaims.consulting performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

staffordclaims.consulting

66 ms

staffordclaims.consulting

46 ms

style.min.css

23 ms

style-coblocks-1.css

67 ms

style-coblocks-extensions.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Staffordclaims.consulting and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (185 ms) belongs to the original domain Staffordclaims.consulting.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.9 kB (6%)

Content Size

668.0 kB

After Optimization

627.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Staffordclaims.consulting main page is 668.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 484.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 35.0 kB

  • Original 45.2 kB
  • After minification 44.5 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 484.4 kB
  • After minification 484.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stafford Claims images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 52.6 kB
  • After minification 52.6 kB
  • After compression 51.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 85.8 kB
  • After minification 85.6 kB
  • After compression 81.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Staffordclaims.consulting has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (63%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stafford Claims. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

staffordclaims.consulting

staffordclaims.consulting

66 ms

staffordclaims.consulting

staffordclaims.consulting

46 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

23 ms

style-coblocks-1.css

style-coblocks-1.css

67 ms

style-coblocks-extensions.css

style-coblocks-extensions.css

32 ms

style-coblocks-animation.css

style-coblocks-animation.css

33 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

37 ms

style.css

style.css

57 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

42 ms

latest.css

latest.css

55 ms

fontfaces.css

fontfaces.css

53 ms

style.css

style.css

54 ms

style-mobile.css

style-mobile.css

62 ms

style.css

style.css

74 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

83 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

71 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

59 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

78 ms

coblocks-animation.js

coblocks-animation.js

112 ms

tiny-swiper.js

tiny-swiper.js

112 ms

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

110 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

110 ms

nivo.slider.min.js

nivo.slider.min.js

110 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

61 ms

tempera-slide1.jpg

tempera-slide1.jpg

64 ms

tempera-slide2.jpg

tempera-slide2.jpg

62 ms

tempera-slide3.jpg

tempera-slide3.jpg

61 ms

tempera-slide4.jpg

tempera-slide4.jpg

59 ms

tempera-slide5.jpg

tempera-slide5.jpg

60 ms

LinkedIn.png

LinkedIn.png

62 ms

Mail.png

Mail.png

63 ms

ubuntu-regular-webfont.woff

ubuntu-regular-webfont.woff

117 ms

yanonekaffeesatz-regular-webfont.woff

yanonekaffeesatz-regular-webfont.woff

108 ms

DroidSans-webfont.woff

DroidSans-webfont.woff

105 ms

elusive.woff

elusive.woff

185 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

79 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

19 ms

Accessibility Review

staffordclaims.consulting accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

staffordclaims.consulting best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

staffordclaims.consulting SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staffordclaims.consulting can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staffordclaims.consulting main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

staffordclaims.consulting

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stafford Claims. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: