4.6 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.8 sec
497 ms
Visit staintalk.com now to see the best up-to-date Staintalk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about staintalk.com
Forsale Lander
Visit staintalk.comWe analyzed Staintalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
staintalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value3.1 s
76/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value3,320 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.7 s
23/100
10%
1371 ms
239 ms
75 ms
75 ms
324 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Staintalk.com, 14% (12 requests) were made to and 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Carbona.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (23%)
6.1 MB
4.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Staintalk.com main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 174.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 292.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Staintalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 625.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 625.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 319.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Staintalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 319.7 kB or 53% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (41%)
71
42
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staintalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
carbona.com
1371 ms
fonts.css
239 ms
styles.css
75 ms
wcdc-public.css
75 ms
style.css
324 ms
wpp.css
77 ms
jquery.js
185 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
111 ms
wcdc-public.js
111 ms
CD815BC18FA154874.css
501 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
132 ms
safe_image.php
208 ms
COj3SgSWwAUSNfa.png
241 ms
eae873ddd86a8a9969dde30dc8bb225b.jpg
245 ms
Qt_pvgpo.png
230 ms
hero-1.jpg
185 ms
SD_girl-dog.jpg
144 ms
SD_mud.png
182 ms
SD_hand.png
295 ms
hero-2.jpg
223 ms
carpet-mug.png
332 ms
carpet-drops.png
230 ms
carpet-hand.png
408 ms
hero-3.jpg
329 ms
laundry-machine.jpg
265 ms
laundry-basket.png
408 ms
laundry-clothes.png
459 ms
laundry-product.png
435 ms
hero-4.jpg
400 ms
grill.png
479 ms
grill-cleaner.png
542 ms
homepage-products-dt.png
625 ms
homepage-products-tab.png
514 ms
fbevents.js
82 ms
carbona-logo.png
444 ms
carbona-sprite.png
468 ms
hero-life-unstained.png
482 ms
yellow-texture.png
493 ms
conquer-homepage-bkgd.jpg
547 ms
RK4saXWWlmUp8npjniXl4Yo4HpZhaPaterg5v8Gr1GvI0zUJ+ZumZxA8yKJJ7vMJbUaMS9kf5ibghCtYVi6vXfOWndgq48zg7kiEMreSeTOpvESzuuCO8l3nDa6h4kgWfN72VrpbVxMbFRXKf9LCU8fENzxs8OfxWyl96C0E6
20 ms
5sZ0C7j3OjuQM+kZyT0b1twgWd9wR3su84TWUPMmCz9vOSlfJcmTjojx+SHpYyvj0hucNHh9+K8Uvu2dBSg==
19 ms
w5PBbKX8BB9hBHg==
20 ms
lR+J+qKmDAu5Oz6owhKGV3Iap4FsEiztuAg9inugaKhav4PWmt9LVspoYuLhI7gMdpjD+f6TzyE4Oz0j5C4+sO9g=
19 ms
mRuCNq6qGAu9OzOgxhaCU3Yir5FsHijtvA45gnu4aK5St4vemtdLWsJgYuLpL7QIdZjI8Pdh7cyeE5KX8ByT49fA==
18 ms
gLgMzvs
18 ms
lR+J+qKmDAu5Oz6owhKGV3Iap4FsEiztuAg9inugaKhav4PWmt9LVspoYuLhI7gMdpjD+f6TzyE4Oz0j5C4+sO9g=
18 ms
UiiSe7zCW1GjEvZH+ZG4I2rqoYC707M6DGFoJTdiKvkWweKO28DjmCe7horlK3i96a10tawmBi4ukvtAh1mMjw92HtzJ4TkpfwHJPj18
18 ms
mJuB9q6qCAu9OzKgxhaCW3YSr4FsHijpvAg5gnuoaKxSt4vemtdLWsJgYuLpL7QIcpjP8f6Tyyk8MzUv4C4DM77A==
17 ms
FbKX3oLQTo=
18 ms
bzkpXyXJk46I8fkh6WMr49IbnDR4ffivFL7tnQUo=
18 ms
Dk8FspfwEH2EEe
17 ms
star.woff
451 ms
171 ms
11737873_10152954141667633_1956778578737231328_n.png
56 ms
hqdefault.jpg
91 ms
photo.jpg
73 ms
CAR_Pin_20150116.png
709 ms
sl_section_bkgd.jpg
387 ms
carbonausa_1437583193_60.jpg
61 ms
scripts.js
300 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
306 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
324 ms
woocommerce.min.js
326 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
336 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
344 ms
plugins.js
364 ms
script.js
362 ms
navigation.js
373 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
380 ms
mobile-detect-php-bridge.php
389 ms
comment-reply.min.js
397 ms
oct.js
5 ms
addthis_widget.js
12 ms
jquery.form.min.js
400 ms
analytics.js
193 ms
adsct
218 ms
adsct
193 ms
carbona.com
313 ms
collect
11 ms
roundtrip.js
19 ms
boost
18 ms
300lo.json
15 ms
sh.07f0d9bf220d07a763adad1e.html
232 ms
layers.173914a8ea2767730b7b.js
13 ms
MN57NTQS3JCBHKHUCS3HX5.js
121 ms
staintalk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
staintalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
staintalk.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staintalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staintalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
staintalk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Staintalk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: