Tools & Wizards About Us
stampsonclick.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

stampsonclick.com

Rubber Stamp Online | Custom Seal Stamps - PreInked Self Inking

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

542 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

328 ms

stampsonclick.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stampsonclick.com homepage info - get ready to check Stamps Onclick best content right away, or after learning these important things about stampsonclick.com

Stamps on Click - Customized rubber stamps / seal stamps, preInked & self inking online – 27 years of experience in delivering quality Indian-made custom rubber stamps to Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, ...

Visit stampsonclick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stampsonclick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 542 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stampsonclick.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value640 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.198

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stampsonclick.com

542 ms

www.stampsonclick.com

1027 ms

bootstrap.min.css

248 ms

style.css

498 ms

angular.min.js

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Stampsonclick.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Stampsonclick.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 183.6 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stampsonclick.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 29.8 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 152.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 913.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stamps Onclick needs image optimization as it can save up to 152.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 150.8 kB
  • After minification 150.8 kB
  • After compression 147.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 40.3 kB
  • After minification 40.3 kB
  • After compression 36.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stampsonclick.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (45%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stamps Onclick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stampsonclick.com

stampsonclick.com

542 ms

www.stampsonclick.com

www.stampsonclick.com

1027 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

248 ms

style.css

style.css

498 ms

angular.min.js

angular.min.js

44 ms

js

js

91 ms

js

js

135 ms

css

css

56 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

49 ms

css

css

71 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

956 ms

loadingoverlay.min.js

loadingoverlay.min.js

738 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

746 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

747 ms

custom.js

custom.js

756 ms

homeController.js

homeController.js

804 ms

livechatController.js

livechatController.js

993 ms

easing.js

easing.js

994 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

995 ms

css

css

27 ms

trustlogo.js

trustlogo.js

76 ms

loader.js

loader.js

57 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

59 ms

logo.png

logo.png

639 ms

lens.png

lens.png

514 ms

carticon.svg

carticon.svg

578 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

1819 ms

headerad.jpg

headerad.jpg

1816 ms

process.svg

process.svg

853 ms

1.png

1.png

953 ms

2.png

2.png

810 ms

3.png

3.png

871 ms

4.png

4.png

1048 ms

5.png

5.png

1096 ms

6.png

6.png

1121 ms

7.png

7.png

1475 ms

8.png

8.png

1288 ms

logohd.png

logohd.png

1583 ms

footer-payment.png

footer-payment.png

1372 ms

init.js

init.js

60 ms

call-tracking_9.js

call-tracking_9.js

35 ms

wcm

wcm

27 ms

1038 ms

chat.png

chat.png

1111 ms

chatpopup.png

chatpopup.png

1226 ms

quick.png

quick.png

1268 ms

rolling.svg

rolling.svg

1319 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

27 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

61 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

68 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

69 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

16 ms

Accessibility Review

stampsonclick.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stampsonclick.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stampsonclick.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stampsonclick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stampsonclick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stampsonclick.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stamps Onclick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: