Tools & Wizards About Us
standardandpoors.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

standardandpoors.com

Home | S&P Global Ratings

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

98 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

473 ms

standardandpoors.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to standardandpoors.com homepage info - get ready to check Standardandpoors best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about standardandpoors.com

We provide intelligence that is embedded into the workflow and decision-making of customers around the globe.

Visit standardandpoors.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Standardandpoors.com page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

standardandpoors.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,130 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.1 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

standardandpoors.com

98 ms

794 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

258 ms

crownpeak.searchg2-1.1.0.js

26 ms

style.css

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Standardandpoors.com, 67% (28 requests) were made to Spglobal.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (794 ms) relates to the external source Spglobal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (37%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Standardandpoors.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 140.2 kB

  • Original 181.1 kB
  • After minification 174.6 kB
  • After compression 40.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 35.6 kB

  • Original 635.9 kB
  • After minification 600.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Standardandpoors images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 820.3 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 841.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 820.3 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 307.6 kB
  • After minification 307.6 kB
  • After compression 286.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Standardandpoors.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (69%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Standardandpoors. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

standardandpoors.com

standardandpoors.com

98 ms

794 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

258 ms

crownpeak.searchg2-1.1.0.js

crownpeak.searchg2-1.1.0.js

26 ms

style.css

style.css

64 ms

stylecorpesg.css

stylecorpesg.css

21 ms

picturefill.js

picturefill.js

27 ms

search-2.0.4.js

search-2.0.4.js

41 ms

ratingshomepage.js

ratingshomepage.js

37 ms

forms2.js

forms2.js

120 ms

printpreview.js

printpreview.js

41 ms

ratingsbundle.js

ratingsbundle.js

45 ms

ratings-style.css

ratings-style.css

51 ms

launch-c44cd1358a69.min.js

launch-c44cd1358a69.min.js

23 ms

ratingshomepageglobal.js

ratingshomepageglobal.js

66 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

107 ms

bundleCorpEsg.js

bundleCorpEsg.js

101 ms

esgsubnav.js

esgsubnav.js

84 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

76 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

120 ms

logo-ratings.png

logo-ratings.png

472 ms

ccc_437.png

ccc_437.png

468 ms

ff_437.png

ff_437.png

56 ms

res_437.png

res_437.png

58 ms

login.register.png

login.register.png

428 ms

akkrg_pro.woff

akkrg_pro.woff

416 ms

AkkuratLightPro.woff

AkkuratLightPro.woff

417 ms

akkbd_pro.woff

akkbd_pro.woff

54 ms

ratingshomepageglobal.js

ratingshomepageglobal.js

84 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

408 ms

in.js

in.js

185 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

59 ms

heap-2872873533.js

heap-2872873533.js

320 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

267 ms

crownpeaksearchproxy.aspx

crownpeaksearchproxy.aspx

243 ms

crownpeaksearchproxy.aspx

crownpeaksearchproxy.aspx

242 ms

crownpeaksearchproxy.aspx

crownpeaksearchproxy.aspx

124 ms

1b11452b-62cc-4fad-8149-9b39c40329a4.json

1b11452b-62cc-4fad-8149-9b39c40329a4.json

29 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

78 ms

location

location

78 ms

container.js

container.js

23 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

standardandpoors.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

standardandpoors.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

standardandpoors.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Standardandpoors.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Standardandpoors.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

standardandpoors.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Standardandpoors. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: