Tools & Wizards About Us
standardsecurity.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

standardsecurity.com

Standard Security Systems | Welcome

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

160 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

439 ms

standardsecurity.com screenshot

About Website

Visit standardsecurity.com now to see the best up-to-date Standard Security content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about standardsecurity.com

Standard Security Systems is more than just the largest independent security company in Connecticut. We are family owned and operated, and that means we make decisions about safety and security for th...

Visit standardsecurity.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Standardsecurity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 160 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

standardsecurity.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.495

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

standardsecurity.com

160 ms

www.standardsecurity.com

178 ms

styles.css

45 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

66 ms

json2.js

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Standardsecurity.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (516 ms) belongs to the original domain Standardsecurity.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 162.0 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Standardsecurity.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 25.9 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 24.1 kB

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Standard Security images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 71.1 kB
  • After minification 69.0 kB
  • After compression 60.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 107.3 kB

  • Original 126.8 kB
  • After minification 97.9 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Standardsecurity.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 107.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (35%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

33

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Standard Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

standardsecurity.com

standardsecurity.com

160 ms

www.standardsecurity.com

www.standardsecurity.com

178 ms

styles.css

styles.css

45 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

66 ms

json2.js

json2.js

81 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

77 ms

nav.js

nav.js

77 ms

form.css

form.css

77 ms

email_capture.js

email_capture.js

79 ms

form_contact.js

form_contact.js

78 ms

jquery.maskedinput.js

jquery.maskedinput.js

86 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

97 ms

jquery.validate.additional.methods.min.js

jquery.validate.additional.methods.min.js

88 ms

jquery.validate.cq.js

jquery.validate.cq.js

88 ms

dialog.css

dialog.css

88 ms

dialog3.js

dialog3.js

90 ms

banner_init.js

banner_init.js

96 ms

google.analytics.js

google.analytics.js

100 ms

js.cookie.js

js.cookie.js

100 ms

reset.css

reset.css

61 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

62 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

98 ms

btn_get_quote.jpg

btn_get_quote.jpg

32 ms

logo_standard_security_systems.jpg

logo_standard_security_systems.jpg

31 ms

icon_phone.png

icon_phone.png

29 ms

nav_down.png

nav_down.png

29 ms

nav_up.png

nav_up.png

29 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

71 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

72 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

454 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

489 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

134 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

438 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

516 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

99 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

133 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

152 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

158 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

155 ms

banner_ribbon.jpg

banner_ribbon.jpg

168 ms

btn_nav_mobile.png

btn_nav_mobile.png

169 ms

default_1.png

default_1.png

181 ms

default_2.png

default_2.png

182 ms

default_3x.jpg

default_3x.jpg

196 ms

default_3x_mobile.jpg

default_3x_mobile.jpg

219 ms

default_4.png

default_4.png

218 ms

default_5.png

default_5.png

236 ms

divider_shadow.png

divider_shadow.png

232 ms

default_6x.png

default_6x.png

245 ms

default_7.png

default_7.png

252 ms

logo_google_plus.png

logo_google_plus.png

258 ms

3.png

3.png

266 ms

loading_dialog.gif

loading_dialog.gif

269 ms

Accessibility Review

standardsecurity.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

standardsecurity.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

standardsecurity.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Standardsecurity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Standardsecurity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

standardsecurity.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Standard Security. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: