Tools & Wizards About Us
standardtestinglab.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

standardtestinglab.com

Best Testing Lab in India | Testing Lab in Delhi - Standard Testing Laboratoryoratory (STL)

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

357 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

175 ms

standardtestinglab.com screenshot

About Website

Visit standardtestinglab.com now to see the best up-to-date Standard Testing Lab content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about standardtestinglab.com

Standard Testing Laboratoryoratories is the Best Testing Lab in Delhi NCR, India.NABL Certified Testing Lab,BIS Certified Lab, Toy Testing, Building Material Testing, Soil Testing etc.

Visit standardtestinglab.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Standardtestinglab.com page load time and found that the first response time was 357 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

standardtestinglab.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.141

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

standardtestinglab.com

357 ms

js

66 ms

css

38 ms

css

54 ms

css

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Standardtestinglab.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (779 ms) belongs to the original domain Standardtestinglab.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.6 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Standardtestinglab.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 28.0 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.3 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 191.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 866.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Standard Testing Lab needs image optimization as it can save up to 191.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 29.3 kB

  • Original 147.7 kB
  • After minification 147.7 kB
  • After compression 118.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 45.2 kB
  • After minification 45.2 kB
  • After compression 42.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Standardtestinglab.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (34%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Standard Testing Lab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

standardtestinglab.com

standardtestinglab.com

357 ms

js

js

66 ms

css

css

38 ms

css

css

54 ms

css

css

59 ms

icon

icon

63 ms

animate.css

animate.css

145 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

325 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

222 ms

style.css

style.css

220 ms

js-image-slider.css

js-image-slider.css

224 ms

js-image-slider.js

js-image-slider.js

208 ms

style.css

style.css

253 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

409 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

421 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

341 ms

wow.js

wow.js

322 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

482 ms

ticker.css

ticker.css

488 ms

marquee-script.js

marquee-script.js

481 ms

wowslider.js

wowslider.js

482 ms

script.js

script.js

510 ms

css

css

19 ms

logo.png

logo.png

155 ms

quality.jpg

quality.jpg

203 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

214 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

155 ms

banner3.jpg

banner3.jpg

235 ms

banner4.jpg

banner4.jpg

184 ms

banner5.jpg

banner5.jpg

210 ms

banner6.jpg

banner6.jpg

222 ms

banner7.jpg

banner7.jpg

288 ms

accreditation-img.jpg

accreditation-img.jpg

311 ms

services-panel.jpg

services-panel.jpg

414 ms

undertaking.png

undertaking.png

316 ms

food-testing.jpg

food-testing.jpg

420 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

336 ms

lt.gif

lt.gif

391 ms

nbcc.jpg

nbcc.jpg

417 ms

ncc.jpg

ncc.jpg

417 ms

nhpc.png

nhpc.png

437 ms

northern-railway.jpeg

northern-railway.jpeg

492 ms

petron.png

petron.png

518 ms

Prasar-Bharati.jpg

Prasar-Bharati.jpg

517 ms

punj.jpg

punj.jpg

518 ms

pwd.png

pwd.png

519 ms

rites.jpg

rites.jpg

537 ms

Shapoorji_&_Pallonji_Group.jpg

Shapoorji_&_Pallonji_Group.jpg

595 ms

UPAVP%20logo.png

UPAVP%20logo.png

622 ms

UP-jjal-Nigam.jpg

UP-jjal-Nigam.jpg

619 ms

valecha.jpg

valecha.jpg

621 ms

dmrc.png

dmrc.png

621 ms

aaoi.png

aaoi.png

637 ms

afcons.png

afcons.png

653 ms

bharat-petro.jpg

bharat-petro.jpg

679 ms

cpwd.png

cpwd.png

674 ms

epi.png

epi.png

667 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

91 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

92 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

779 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

91 ms

hp.png

hp.png

589 ms

indian-oil.jpg

indian-oil.jpg

645 ms

Accessibility Review

standardtestinglab.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

standardtestinglab.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

standardtestinglab.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Standardtestinglab.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Standardtestinglab.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

standardtestinglab.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Standard Testing Lab. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: