Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

stanislaussurgical.com

Home - Stanislaus Surgical Hospital

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

452 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

297 ms

stanislaussurgical.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stanislaussurgical.com homepage info - get ready to check Stanislaus Surgical best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about stanislaussurgical.com

Our HospitalPrecision ImagingPain ManagementPhysical TherapyThe Stanislaus DifferenceStanislaus Surgical Hospital is among California’s leading surgical hospitals. We offer a wide range of healthcar.....

Visit stanislaussurgical.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stanislaussurgical.com page load time and found that the first response time was 452 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stanislaussurgical.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.stanislaussurgical.com

452 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

66 ms

styles.css

57 ms

nivo-slider.css

59 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Stanislaussurgical.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (641 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 892.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Stanislaussurgical.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 21.2 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 37.1 kB

  • Original 787.6 kB
  • After minification 750.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stanislaus Surgical images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 774.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 341.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 774.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 65.2 kB

  • Original 78.6 kB
  • After minification 62.6 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stanislaussurgical.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (44%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stanislaus Surgical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

stanislaussurgical.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

stanislaussurgical.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

stanislaussurgical.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stanislaussurgical.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stanislaussurgical.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stanislaus Surgical. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: