Tools & Wizards About Us
stanleyfoam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

stanleyfoam.com

Stanley Foam Co. - Polyurethane Foam | Wallington, NJ

Page Load Speed

991 ms in total

First Response

113 ms

Resources Loaded

648 ms

Page Rendered

230 ms

stanleyfoam.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stanley Foam content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stanleyfoam.com

In business since 1965. FREE problem solving advice. Upholstery products. Polyurethane foam. Foam rubber, supplies, tools and more. Call 973-778-1660.

Visit stanleyfoam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stanleyfoam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 878 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stanleyfoam.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stanleyfoam.com

113 ms

www.stanleyfoam.com

236 ms

hic.js

20 ms

10377046-480w.jpg

181 ms

hibu-runtime.css

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Stanleyfoam.com, 29% (6 requests) were made to Le-cdn.hibuwebsites.com and 19% (4 requests) were made to Static-res-cdn.websites.hibu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (263 ms) relates to the external source Le-cdn.hibuwebsites.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 126.0 kB (35%)

Content Size

363.1 kB

After Optimization

237.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stanleyfoam.com main page is 363.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 203.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 81.1 kB

  • Original 135.7 kB
  • After minification 131.7 kB
  • After compression 54.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.1 kB or 60% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 433 B

  • Original 24.0 kB
  • After minification 23.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stanley Foam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 44.4 kB

  • Original 203.3 kB
  • After minification 196.5 kB
  • After compression 158.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.4 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 101 B
  • After minification 101 B
  • After compression 89 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stanleyfoam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12 B or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (50%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stanley Foam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stanleyfoam.com

stanleyfoam.com

113 ms

www.stanleyfoam.com

www.stanleyfoam.com

236 ms

hic.js

hic.js

20 ms

10377046-480w.jpg

10377046-480w.jpg

181 ms

hibu-runtime.css

hibu-runtime.css

12 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

63 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

81 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

84 ms

AppMeasurement.js

AppMeasurement.js

96 ms

hibu-analytics.min.js

hibu-analytics.min.js

100 ms

omn_setting.js

omn_setting.js

91 ms

9953452-920w.png

9953452-920w.png

261 ms

xcrhl9_-hlv1cjgcjzy_1kxl8aa-271w.png

xcrhl9_-hlv1cjgcjzy_1kxl8aa-271w.png

262 ms

g6pmbdth2rmx2egqr0sz-ewp45q-270w.png

g6pmbdth2rmx2egqr0sz-ewp45q-270w.png

263 ms

jjtrajkcccwbhpyype1g7sfezxi-270w.png

jjtrajkcccwbhpyype1g7sfezxi-270w.png

167 ms

mxpffe_mxv2wfug3ocs1ac1jtuu-271w.png

mxpffe_mxv2wfug3ocs1ac1jtuu-271w.png

166 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

15 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

11 ms

42 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

5 ms

aem.js

aem.js

30 ms

Accessibility Review

stanleyfoam.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

stanleyfoam.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

stanleyfoam.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stanleyfoam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stanleyfoam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stanleyfoam.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stanley Foam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: