11.3 sec in total
440 ms
10.2 sec
603 ms
Welcome to stantonparkllc.com homepage info - get ready to check Stanton Park Llc best content right away, or after learning these important things about stantonparkllc.com
Visit stantonparkllc.comWe analyzed Stantonparkllc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 440 ms and then it took 10.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
stantonparkllc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value21.5 s
0/100
25%
Value16.4 s
0/100
10%
Value1,860 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.072
96/100
15%
Value22.5 s
1/100
10%
440 ms
6558 ms
186 ms
361 ms
195 ms
Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Stantonparkllc.com, 4% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Stantonparkllc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 479.2 kB (16%)
3.0 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Stantonparkllc.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.1 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 138.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stanton Park Llc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 135.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.2 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stantonparkllc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.4 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (37%)
107
67
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stanton Park Llc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stantonparkllc.com
440 ms
stantonparkllc.com
6558 ms
formidableforms.css
186 ms
styles.css
361 ms
style.css
195 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
197 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
268 ms
swiper.min.css
204 ms
post-995.css
254 ms
global.css
258 ms
all.css
35 ms
v4-shims.css
47 ms
jquery.min.js
330 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
273 ms
css2
38 ms
yza0jhh.css
60 ms
css
20 ms
liquid-icon.min.css
274 ms
font-awesome.min.css
274 ms
theme-vendors.min.css
305 ms
theme.min.css
472 ms
fourtre.css
340 ms
custom.min.css
339 ms
modernizr.min.js
343 ms
jquery.min.js
321 ms
three.min.js
34 ms
theme-vendors.js
600 ms
anime.min.js
349 ms
theme.min.js
435 ms
service.js
358 ms
custom.js
388 ms
index.js
414 ms
index.js
434 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
540 ms
api.js
39 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
541 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
541 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
542 ms
index.js
542 ms
akismet-frontend.js
543 ms
gtm.js
66 ms
p.css
24 ms
logo-b.png
443 ms
logo.png
322 ms
6.svg
322 ms
2.svg
442 ms
4.svg
443 ms
5.svg
443 ms
9.png
478 ms
11.png
478 ms
12.png
479 ms
13.png
480 ms
14.png
481 ms
15.png
481 ms
8.png
567 ms
7.png
570 ms
5.png
569 ms
4.png
567 ms
3.png
567 ms
2.png
568 ms
1.png
574 ms
2-15.png
581 ms
2-14.png
574 ms
2-13.png
540 ms
2-12.png
513 ms
2-11.png
507 ms
2-10.png
534 ms
2-9.png
568 ms
css2
20 ms
2-8.png
492 ms
2-7.png
610 ms
2-6.png
477 ms
2-5.png
389 ms
2-4.png
443 ms
2-3.png
448 ms
2-1.png
452 ms
3-15.png
451 ms
stantonparkllc.com
1003 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
211 ms
d
51 ms
d
172 ms
d
209 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
236 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
173 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
174 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
209 ms
fontawesome-webfont%EF%B9%96v=4.7.0.woff
461 ms
liquid-icon.woff
512 ms
3-14.png
449 ms
recaptcha__en.js
141 ms
3-13.png
339 ms
3-12.png
392 ms
3-11.png
412 ms
3-10.png
411 ms
3-9.png
377 ms
3-8.png
420 ms
3-7.png
428 ms
3-6.png
434 ms
3-5.png
433 ms
3-4.png
418 ms
3-3.png
396 ms
3-2.png
404 ms
3-1.png
410 ms
4-15.png
409 ms
4-13.png
420 ms
4-12.png
461 ms
4-11.png
460 ms
4-9.png
457 ms
4-8.png
457 ms
4-4.png
472 ms
4-2.png
510 ms
4-1.png
518 ms
6.png
462 ms
16.png
460 ms
17.png
468 ms
29.png
567 ms
28.jpg
471 ms
Array
2257 ms
logo.png
464 ms
12.jpg
467 ms
stantonparkllc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
stantonparkllc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
stantonparkllc.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stantonparkllc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stantonparkllc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stantonparkllc.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stanton Park Llc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: