Tools & Wizards About Us
star.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

star.com

Home

Page Load Speed

850 ms in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

639 ms

Page Rendered

182 ms

star.com screenshot

About Website

Visit star.com now to see the best up-to-date Star content for Egypt and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about star.com

Visit star.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Star.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 821 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

star.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,240 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

star.com

29 ms

www.star.com

151 ms

launch-EN6502d1882f9d44cf8031e7a2309a3e2e.min.js

143 ms

main.lc-925f1b1514d2bf6224d0426821e38cb1-lc.min.css

11 ms

microsite.lc-882c6908e96a5c2f253f45e3bf8ff152-lc.min.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Star.com, 24% (6 requests) were made to S7d2.scene7.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (189 ms) relates to the external source Na-sj39.marketo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 672.0 kB (55%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

543.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Star.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 755.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 37.7 kB
  • After minification 33.3 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 422.0 kB
  • After minification 387.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Star images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 608.6 kB

  • Original 755.7 kB
  • After minification 755.7 kB
  • After compression 147.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 608.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (55%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Star. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

star.com

star.com

29 ms

www.star.com

www.star.com

151 ms

launch-EN6502d1882f9d44cf8031e7a2309a3e2e.min.js

launch-EN6502d1882f9d44cf8031e7a2309a3e2e.min.js

143 ms

main.lc-925f1b1514d2bf6224d0426821e38cb1-lc.min.css

main.lc-925f1b1514d2bf6224d0426821e38cb1-lc.min.css

11 ms

microsite.lc-882c6908e96a5c2f253f45e3bf8ff152-lc.min.css

microsite.lc-882c6908e96a5c2f253f45e3bf8ff152-lc.min.css

45 ms

star-nav-logo

star-nav-logo

139 ms

dynamicmedia.lc-a97e0418f0d0d6fe2eea57c7dc5e8804-lc.min.css

dynamicmedia.lc-a97e0418f0d0d6fe2eea57c7dc5e8804-lc.min.css

50 ms

viewer.lc-78cc99cb08222001ca2bdf214cc2727b-lc.min.js

viewer.lc-78cc99cb08222001ca2bdf214cc2727b-lc.min.js

58 ms

jquery.lc-f9e8e8c279baf6a1a278042afe4f395a-lc.min.js

jquery.lc-f9e8e8c279baf6a1a278042afe4f395a-lc.min.js

64 ms

utils.lc-899004cc02c33efc1f6694b1aee587fd-lc.min.js

utils.lc-899004cc02c33efc1f6694b1aee587fd-lc.min.js

61 ms

dynamicmedia.lc-5a9b56bbce7753fe42095b2df91dd9d7-lc.min.js

dynamicmedia.lc-5a9b56bbce7753fe42095b2df91dd9d7-lc.min.js

61 ms

i18n.lc-b58a29e31169aff220dc1e89391c5572-lc.min.js

i18n.lc-b58a29e31169aff220dc1e89391c5572-lc.min.js

61 ms

html5-player.lc-23b7202e36f4d98a112f1c1b9ac7dcde-lc.min.js

html5-player.lc-23b7202e36f4d98a112f1c1b9ac7dcde-lc.min.js

60 ms

forms2.js

forms2.js

189 ms

main.lc-76d6ae827387538c258357a54228127f-lc.min.js

main.lc-76d6ae827387538c258357a54228127f-lc.min.js

129 ms

microsite.lc-166e8d029408609570a0f31a0c6c1b08-lc.min.js

microsite.lc-166e8d029408609570a0f31a0c6c1b08-lc.min.js

135 ms

GettyImages-1153816803

GettyImages-1153816803

155 ms

microsite.lc-882c6908e96a5c2f253f45e3bf8ff152-lc.min.css

microsite.lc-882c6908e96a5c2f253f45e3bf8ff152-lc.min.css

81 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

96 ms

Twitter

Twitter

97 ms

facebook_circle-512

facebook_circle-512

97 ms

linkedin-circle-logo

linkedin-circle-logo

97 ms

fiserv-logo

fiserv-logo

98 ms

token.json

token.json

157 ms

UniversForFiserv65-Bd.otf

UniversForFiserv65-Bd.otf

7 ms

Accessibility Review

star.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

star.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

star.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Star.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Star.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

star.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Star. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: