Tools & Wizards About Us
starchprojectsolution.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

starchprojectsolution.com

Manufacturer of starch processing machine for cassava processing plant and potato/sweet potato starch processing plant

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

394 ms

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

551 ms

starchprojectsolution.com screenshot

About Website

Visit starchprojectsolution.com now to see the best up-to-date Starch Projectsolution content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about starchprojectsolution.com

Doing Holdings-Henan Jinrui, as professional manufacturers and supplier, can provide cassava starch processing machine, potato starch processing machine and sweet potato stach processing machine for y...

Visit starchprojectsolution.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Starchprojectsolution.com page load time and found that the first response time was 394 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

starchprojectsolution.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.089

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

starchprojectsolution.com

394 ms

www.starchprojectsolution.com

454 ms

style.css

132 ms

swiper.min.css

131 ms

video.dev.js

201 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Starchprojectsolution.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Starchprojectsolution.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 469.9 kB (10%)

Content Size

4.9 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Starchprojectsolution.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 97.0 kB

  • Original 112.3 kB
  • After minification 80.7 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.6 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 148.4 kB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starch Projectsolution images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 221.7 kB

  • Original 476.8 kB
  • After minification 476.8 kB
  • After compression 255.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.7 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 101.0 kB
  • After minification 101.0 kB
  • After compression 98.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starchprojectsolution.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (25%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

63

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starch Projectsolution. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

starchprojectsolution.com

starchprojectsolution.com

394 ms

www.starchprojectsolution.com

www.starchprojectsolution.com

454 ms

style.css

style.css

132 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

131 ms

video.dev.js

video.dev.js

201 ms

video.css

video.css

144 ms

index.css

index.css

139 ms

edit.css

edit.css

138 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

198 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

200 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

274 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

282 ms

main.js

main.js

228 ms

layer.js

layer.js

263 ms

js

js

50 ms

layui.css

layui.css

267 ms

global.css

global.css

265 ms

kf.css

kf.css

227 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

105 ms

email.png

email.png

107 ms

logo.png

logo.png

111 ms

2-1Z921143HL39.jpg

2-1Z921143HL39.jpg

322 ms

2-1Q21Q63H0410.jpg

2-1Q21Q63H0410.jpg

258 ms

2-1Q10913510BI.jpg

2-1Q10913510BI.jpg

260 ms

2-211016141243519.jpg

2-211016141243519.jpg

364 ms

20220421153809.jpg

20220421153809.jpg

302 ms

20220421160053.jpg

20220421160053.jpg

242 ms

2-1Z41515361I43.jpg

2-1Z41515361I43.jpg

1620 ms

2-1Q211143213H4.jpg

2-1Q211143213H4.jpg

1176 ms

2-1Q02Z92216438.jpg

2-1Q02Z92216438.jpg

1881 ms

20220424094248.jpg

20220424094248.jpg

1817 ms

2-201222160630231.jpg

2-201222160630231.jpg

1799 ms

2-21011Z92U93N.jpg

2-21011Z92U93N.jpg

1930 ms

202408241449321950.jpg

202408241449321950.jpg

2082 ms

2-200Z4114631115.jpg

2-200Z4114631115.jpg

1817 ms

2-1Z9111635242H.jpg

2-1Z9111635242H.jpg

2466 ms

dj1.jpg

dj1.jpg

2601 ms

dj2.jpg

dj2.jpg

1949 ms

dj3.jpg

dj3.jpg

2015 ms

dj4.jpg

dj4.jpg

2182 ms

dj5.jpg

dj5.jpg

2807 ms

20230201105951.jpg

20230201105951.jpg

5189 ms

20221007164116.jpg

20221007164116.jpg

2919 ms

20220923114601.jpg

20220923114601.jpg

2688 ms

20220921142728.jpg

20220921142728.jpg

3390 ms

2-200ZG50JGL.jpg

2-200ZG50JGL.jpg

3771 ms

Open-Sans.ttf

Open-Sans.ttf

3797 ms

2-21012F93TM40.jpg

2-21012F93TM40.jpg

3064 ms

Open-Sans-Bold.ttf

Open-Sans-Bold.ttf

3149 ms

ETmodules.ttf

ETmodules.ttf

3348 ms

e1.png

e1.png

3215 ms

e2.png

e2.png

3269 ms

layer.css

layer.css

3334 ms

e3.png

e3.png

3380 ms

e4.png

e4.png

3358 ms

20221012115248.jpg

20221012115248.jpg

4093 ms

51.png

51.png

3411 ms

20220722162422.jpg

20220722162422.jpg

3599 ms

20220514180623.jpg

20220514180623.jpg

4230 ms

202408211444512582.jpg

202408211444512582.jpg

3806 ms

202408141440485753.jpg

202408141440485753.jpg

4600 ms

202408071416116112.jpg

202408071416116112.jpg

3988 ms

202407241430575120.jpg

202407241430575120.jpg

4686 ms

202405291639021932.jpg

202405291639021932.jpg

3978 ms

202401101415506211.jpg

202401101415506211.jpg

2958 ms

202312281138597322.jpg

202312281138597322.jpg

2754 ms

202303151041173961.jpg

202303151041173961.jpg

3060 ms

47.png

47.png

2829 ms

48.png

48.png

2834 ms

50.png

50.png

2854 ms

52-2.jpg

52-2.jpg

2969 ms

qq_online.png

qq_online.png

2927 ms

contact.png

contact.png

2884 ms

message.png

message.png

2804 ms

top.png

top.png

2541 ms

IvEsRuGCYg8

IvEsRuGCYg8

118 ms

desktop-background.png

desktop-background.png

2670 ms

flag.png

flag.png

1638 ms

lx.jpg

lx.jpg

2966 ms

Open-Sans-Light.ttf

Open-Sans-Light.ttf

2296 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

8 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

25 ms

base.js

base.js

46 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

124 ms

XRk6eFbYaDme_I9SSIFgFZ9I1nSvAmlSIHv6h58Lfu0.js

XRk6eFbYaDme_I9SSIFgFZ9I1nSvAmlSIHv6h58Lfu0.js

104 ms

embed.js

embed.js

39 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

38 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

43 ms

id

id

24 ms

Create

Create

80 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

14 ms

log_event

log_event

19 ms

Accessibility Review

starchprojectsolution.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

starchprojectsolution.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

starchprojectsolution.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starchprojectsolution.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starchprojectsolution.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

starchprojectsolution.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starch Projectsolution. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: